You keep spamming the same old fraud study from the country of COLUMBIA
this study you keep linking used old data, hid all the 2022 data and counted suspected and probable covid cases. LOL!
You keep spamming the same old fraud study from the country of COLUMBIA
You've complained about it more often, so it's actually you that keeps mentioning it, although I doubt you could actually link to it.
The lurkers are laughing at you.
You hope.
Your propaganda
The stuff from the New England Journal of Medicine, Johns Hopkins, Yale Medical School? You can call it propaganda, go ahead. But who are you? Just another nameless nobody with flaky opinions.l
Your “experts” publish fraud.
You keep spamming the same old fraud study from the country of COLUMBIA this study you keep linking used old data, hid all the 2022 data and counted suspected and probable covid cases. LOL!
The lurkers are laughing at you.
Your propaganda is a laughing stock
Your unsupported opinion is noted.
You've complained about it more often, so it's actually you that keeps mentioning it, although I doubt you could actually link to it.
You hope.
The stuff from the New England Journal of Medicine, Johns Hopkins, Yale Medical School? You can call it propaganda, go ahead. But who are you? Just another nameless nobody with flaky opinions.l
Nothing changes these 3 facts.
1. You only link “studies” that use old 2020 & 2021 covid data,
2. You hide all the 2022 data and
3. Your “studies” count suspected and probable covid cases
It takes time to analyze millions of records.
You don't produce any data from 2022 either.
If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then it's a duck.
Counting SUSPECTED and PROBABLE covid cases is not “science”.
IT IS PROPAGANDA.
If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then it's a duck.
You’re confirming your “studies” use guessing techniques to count covid.
LOL