Chazzle is right. Nothing you say is true. You admitted you don’t understand math, you don’t understand statistics.
No one believes the injections works. And no one believes they are safe. C
Even u/urallfucked doesnt believe they work and knows the booster is dangerous. u/UrAllFucked admitted she REFUSED THE BOOSTER. No one believes you Tuchodi
You are stuck defending a giant turd. A vaccine that doesn’t prevent infection, that doesn’t prevent transmission, that doesn’t reduce hospitalization rates.
The triple vaccinated and double vaccinated are NOW MAJORITY ICU.
No one believes you. Just ask u/urallfucked why she doesn’t believe you
A vaccine that doesn’t prevent infection, that doesn’t prevent transmission,
Life comes with risks - especially during global pandemics - and I know this scares you. Try some deep breathing exercises. They'll help you to live in the real world.
that doesn’t reduce hospitalization rates.
You should stop relying on your own opinions, since you don't have the education or the experience to support them. Like your electronic devices, where you have no idea what's going on under the plastic. You should take the advice of the people who do know. Like these folks, for example: April 25, 2022 "We found that the risk of infection was markedly higher among unvaccinated people than among vaccinated people under all mixing assumptions ... risk associated with avoiding vaccination during a virulent pandemic accrues chiefly to people who are unvaccinated" https://www.cmaj.ca/content/194/16/E573.
The triple vaccinated and double vaccinated are NOW MAJORITY ICU
But still under-represented when compared to the unvaccinated. Here are yesterday's figures from Ontario, where the unvaccinated are about four times more likely to wind up in the ICU: https://covid19-sciencetable.ca/ontario-dashboard/
Did you just post the Fisman fictitious computer modeling that had zero observational data? LOL
Your fictitious article:
DISCLAIMER:The simplicity of our model is a weakness, because it does not precisely simulate a real-world pandemic process in all its complexity.
It’s all a simulation, it’s based of hypothesis and suppositions and not reproducible.
I feel sorry for you. You just can’t stop failing.
"The simplicity of our model is both a strength (it is transparent
and easily modified to explore the impact of uncertainty) and a
weakness, because it does not precisely simulate a real-world
pandemic process in all its complexity. For instance, we mod-
elled vaccine effectiveness against infection but not the addi-
tional benefits of vaccination for preventing severe illness.
Although this benefit is not captured by a simple model focused
on transmission, an advantage of models such as ours is that
they provide a ready platform for layering on increasing com-
plexity, so our model can be adapted or expanded to consider
impacts on the health system, or to incorporate additional struc-
tural elements or alternate assumptions. We have also likely
underestimated vaccine benefit in this model, as we have not
attempted to capture the impact of vaccines on prevention of
forward transmission by vaccinated, infected individuals; this
effect appears to be substantial.4"
Chazzle is right. Nothing you say is true. You admitted you don’t understand math, you don’t understand statistics.
No one believes the injections works. And no one believes they are safe. C
Even u/urallfucked doesnt believe they work and knows the booster is dangerous.
u/UrAllFucked admitted she REFUSED THE BOOSTER. No one believes you Tuchodi
You are stuck defending a giant turd. A vaccine that doesn’t prevent infection, that doesn’t prevent transmission, that doesn’t reduce hospitalization rates.
The triple vaccinated and double vaccinated are NOW MAJORITY ICU.
No one believes you. Just ask u/urallfucked why she doesn’t believe you
Except, of course, the 90% of Canadians who have had the shot. https://health-infobase.canada.ca/covid-19/vaccination-coverage/
Life comes with risks - especially during global pandemics - and I know this scares you. Try some deep breathing exercises. They'll help you to live in the real world.
You should stop relying on your own opinions, since you don't have the education or the experience to support them. Like your electronic devices, where you have no idea what's going on under the plastic. You should take the advice of the people who do know. Like these folks, for example: April 25, 2022 "We found that the risk of infection was markedly higher among unvaccinated people than among vaccinated people under all mixing assumptions ... risk associated with avoiding vaccination during a virulent pandemic accrues chiefly to people who are unvaccinated" https://www.cmaj.ca/content/194/16/E573.
But still under-represented when compared to the unvaccinated. Here are yesterday's figures from Ontario, where the unvaccinated are about four times more likely to wind up in the ICU: https://covid19-sciencetable.ca/ontario-dashboard/
Did you just post the Fisman fictitious computer modeling that had zero observational data? LOL
Your fictitious article:
DISCLAIMER: The simplicity of our model is a weakness, because it does not precisely simulate a real-world pandemic process in all its complexity. It’s all a simulation, it’s based of hypothesis and suppositions and not reproducible.
I feel sorry for you. You just can’t stop failing.
Someone needs to show you how to quote correctly.
"The simplicity of our model is both a strength (it is transparent and easily modified to explore the impact of uncertainty) and a weakness, because it does not precisely simulate a real-world pandemic process in all its complexity. For instance, we mod- elled vaccine effectiveness against infection but not the addi- tional benefits of vaccination for preventing severe illness. Although this benefit is not captured by a simple model focused on transmission, an advantage of models such as ours is that they provide a ready platform for layering on increasing com- plexity, so our model can be adapted or expanded to consider impacts on the health system, or to incorporate additional struc- tural elements or alternate assumptions. We have also likely underestimated vaccine benefit in this model, as we have not attempted to capture the impact of vaccines on prevention of forward transmission by vaccinated, infected individuals; this effect appears to be substantial.4"
https://www.cmaj.ca/content/cmaj/194/16/E573.full.pdf
Exactly it’s a fictional computer model.
Cannot be reproduced.
And this computer model is what you’re claiming proves the vaccine is not a failure