The former CEO of news outlet Reuters, James C. Smith sits on the Pfizer board and is a top investor for the pharmaceuticals giant.
u/tuchodi does not believe there is a conflict of interest when corporate media outlets such as Reuters promote Pfizer’s experimental products, she does not believe there is a bias if Reuters or AP ”fact-checks” a Pfizer criticism, and Tuchodi thinks it’s normal when Reuters/AP moves to silence Pfizer’s skeptics.
u/tuchodi also thinks it’s ethical for the head of the FDA to now be an investor in Pfizer and have his salary now paid by Pfizer. The 2019 head of the FDA, Scott Gottlieb, left the regulatory agency to join Pfizer’s Board of Directors
u/tuchodi believes the FDA and she also believes that Reuters/AP is unbiased. LOL. She posts AP/Reuters fact checks too and believes that they mean something
Proving once again, she is a trained monkey who copy pastes propaganda.
The former CEO of news outlet Reuters, James C. Smith sits on the Pfizer board and is a top investor for the pharmaceuticals giant.
u/tuchodi does not believe there is a conflict of interest when corporate media outlets such as Reuters promote Pfizer’s experimental products, she does not believe there is a bias if Reuters or AP ”fact-checks” a Pfizer criticism, and Tuchodi thinks it’s normal when Reuters/AP moves to silence Pfizer’s skeptics.
u/tuchodi also thinks it’s ethical for the head of the FDA to now be an investor in Pfizer and have his salary now paid by Pfizer. The 2019 head of the FDA, Scott Gottlieb, left the regulatory agency to join Pfizer’s Board of Directors
u/tuchodi believes the FDA and she also believes that Reuters/AP is unbiased. LOL. She posts AP/Reuters fact checks too and believes that they mean something
Proving once again, she is a trained monkey who copy pastes propaganda.
CanadianRighty linked to Reuters. Talk to them.
Canadian Righty doesnt post AP or Reuters “Fact Checks” propaganda piece written by journalists and bloggers and pretend they mean something. You do.
No one here is surprised with your lack of ethics though.
You claim “PROBABLE” and “SUSPECTED” cases of covid is ethical too
You obviously didn't follow the link.
Nice to see Reuters being accepted as a creditable source.
Do you admire China’s basic dictatorship as much as your leader does?
No. Do you?
But thanks for using Reuters. Nice to know I'm not alone.
Reuters pumps out plenty of trash.
I don’t accept news articles from any source or side as gospel, that’s more of a leftist type behaviour.
It's just that I've been told here that "Reuters is trash" or words to that effect. It's good to know not everyone feels that way.