The word "temporarily" is right in the title of the paper. The conlusion states "Systemic immune response after BNT162b2 vaccine is a reasonable cause for transient semen concentration and TMC decline. Long-term prognosis remains good."
Another word for 'transient' is 'temporary'.
OP doesn't mention that the effect is temporary. They're just going for the scare factor.
If an ineffective gene therapy made you temporarily blind or made you temporarily bleed continuously from your behind (while giving you heart inflammation), would you take it?
The Vancouver Sun article you linked to has perhaps half a dozen potential adverse reactions to vaccines while noting no perceptible increase in strokes in the US.
temporarily blind or made you temporarily bleed continuously from your behind (while giving you heart inflammation)
Where does that come from? It isn't in your piece. What's your source?
It's an analog (i.e. "Something that bears an analogy to something else; something that is comparable."), genius, the suggestion of which was that any temporary medical problem ought to be taken deadly seriously.
I'm beginning to think you're not mentally ill but rather a grassroots spokesperson for Big Pharma. You realize that prior to the pandemic, most drugs are taken off the market if there is more than a handful of deaths or serious adverse effects? That even if the clot shots only slew a few thousand, they shouldn't be pushed on the population.
any temporary medical problem ought to be taken deadly seriously.
You are refusing to recognize, admit, or care - not sure which - that you are promoting the collapse of the healthcare system, and you need to be called on it.
That's talking point #2 in the Anti-Vax Handbook, right behind "Don't believe the experts. Some of them are lying to you and the rest are too dumb to know they're being played."
I could easily say something similar about you: "They are paralyzed by fear of the global pandemic and are refusing to accept that it's real", or "They are agents of our enemies, taking advantage of the global pandemic to destabilize our society", or just "They are shit disturbing trolls".
I don't know what you are, but when I notice you making silly claims and spreading misinformation I'll probably point it out.
The word "temporarily" is right in the title of the paper. The conlusion states "Systemic immune response after BNT162b2 vaccine is a reasonable cause for transient semen concentration and TMC decline. Long-term prognosis remains good."
Another word for 'transient' is 'temporary'.
OP doesn't mention that the effect is temporary. They're just going for the scare factor.
If an ineffective gene therapy made you temporarily blind or made you temporarily bleed continuously from your behind (while giving you heart inflammation), would you take it?
More than 12 billion shots delivered. https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/covid-vaccine-tracker-global-distribution/
The Vancouver Sun article you linked to has perhaps half a dozen potential adverse reactions to vaccines while noting no perceptible increase in strokes in the US.
Where does that come from? It isn't in your piece. What's your source?
It's an analog (i.e. "Something that bears an analogy to something else; something that is comparable."), genius, the suggestion of which was that any temporary medical problem ought to be taken deadly seriously.
I'm beginning to think you're not mentally ill but rather a grassroots spokesperson for Big Pharma. You realize that prior to the pandemic, most drugs are taken off the market if there is more than a handful of deaths or serious adverse effects? That even if the clot shots only slew a few thousand, they shouldn't be pushed on the population.
You are refusing to recognize, admit, or care - not sure which - that you are promoting the collapse of the healthcare system, and you need to be called on it.
Provincial medical records all show that unvaccinated people are over-represented in hospital and ICU beds - for example Alberta https://www.alberta.ca/stats/covid-19-alberta-statistics.htm, Ontario https://covid19-sciencetable.ca/ontario-dashboard/, and BC http://www.bccdc.ca/health-professionals/data-reports/covid-19-surveillance-dashboard.
Yet here you are arguing against vaccination.
That's talking point #2 in the Anti-Vax Handbook, right behind "Don't believe the experts. Some of them are lying to you and the rest are too dumb to know they're being played."
I could easily say something similar about you: "They are paralyzed by fear of the global pandemic and are refusing to accept that it's real", or "They are agents of our enemies, taking advantage of the global pandemic to destabilize our society", or just "They are shit disturbing trolls".
I don't know what you are, but when I notice you making silly claims and spreading misinformation I'll probably point it out.