If an incel raped a woman, I guess they wouldn't be an 'involuntary celibate' any longer. They'd just be a ... rapist.
First off, abortion is not universally illegal in the US. It's now up to the individual states to set the laws, as it always should have been.
So the constituents of those states can DEMOCRATICALLY determine whether or not abortion will be legal within their geography.
I was told by the media over the past couple years that democracy is important and we cannot let it die in darkness...
What's more: You realize individuals in the US have freedom of mobility? So in the 18 states presently outlawing abortion, the hoes or in the case of your exceptional case (statistically super rare among abortions, up there with incest pregnancies) can go to the eugenicist/profiteer states to kill their child.
Since they will go to another state to murder their child, it' a different jurisdiction, meaning they cannot be penalized upon return.
And now all the abortion profiteers and lobby groups that raised money to protect Roe can now fund travel arrangements for abortion seekers.
Btw you're basically saying "anyone who can't afford to travel across statelines deserves to have their choice taken away from them" it really is just about pushing down on the 99% huh
First off, your freedom to have sex is coupled with a responsibility (i.e. for what sex inevitably leads to). American citizens should not be coerced into financing the murder of your child because you don't want the responsibility and didn't feel like using contraceptives or practicing abstinence.
Second, it's paternalistic to think that 'daddy' state must intervene every time someone reaps what they sows as it pertains to sex (here not talking about the extremely rare cases of rape and incest pregnancies). The mentality amongst the left in the West is that the fruits and consequences of one's recklessness ought to be deferred to the state or to the group.
Third, NGOs make oodles of money squeezing abortion zealots, eugenicists, and political affiliates; they can finance the murder of poor babies, achieving Sanger's goal of culling the lower classes and minorities and also narrowing the accessibility gap. Dick's Sporting Goods is giving $4K to each employee who wants to go cut up their spawn in another state. You can bet your ass ESG ratings will now reflect a listed company's willingness to pay for its employees to go to a blue state to murder their unborn child.
Fourth and final: concerning class (which the 99% rhetoric gets into), abortion is a means of class warfare, by the rich against the poor. Big corporations do not want to pay for a new addition to an employees' healthcare plan. Insurance, after all, is costly. They don't want employees' attention divided. What's more: they want more women in the workforce, not at a home, because this fills the talent pool, and depresses wages (more labor, less employer demand, lower wages needed to attract talent). Abortion, extra to having been Tommy Douglas and Margaret Sanger and the Hitlerite's way of killing off all those walks of human life that they felt unfit (i.e. to hire; here is Sanger at a KKK rally), and the Chinese Communists' way of ensuring they did not have to take on the burden of 750 million souls, has always been a way of regulating the reproduction systems of the poor. Those lefties citing economics as justification for the taking of innocent babies' lives should go about improving the economy rather than offing the next generation.
Nope, still incels. Sexual assault is not sex. Just violence.
Forcing people to up and go to a different state for basic Healthcare is still oppression and will result in many unwanted pregnancies from people totally unprepared for. Plus you can bet it's only going to get worse from here. US really has shown it's true colors as a fascist theocracy
Yay! Now incel rapists can reproduce by states forcing women to have their babies! Truly a win for all humanity, not just the deplorable s/
If an incel raped a woman, I guess they wouldn't be an 'involuntary celibate' any longer. They'd just be a ... rapist.
First off, abortion is not universally illegal in the US. It's now up to the individual states to set the laws, as it always should have been.
So the constituents of those states can DEMOCRATICALLY determine whether or not abortion will be legal within their geography.
I was told by the media over the past couple years that democracy is important and we cannot let it die in darkness...
What's more: You realize individuals in the US have freedom of mobility? So in the 18 states presently outlawing abortion, the hoes or in the case of your exceptional case (statistically super rare among abortions, up there with incest pregnancies) can go to the eugenicist/profiteer states to kill their child.
Since they will go to another state to murder their child, it' a different jurisdiction, meaning they cannot be penalized upon return.
And now all the abortion profiteers and lobby groups that raised money to protect Roe can now fund travel arrangements for abortion seekers.
Btw you're basically saying "anyone who can't afford to travel across statelines deserves to have their choice taken away from them" it really is just about pushing down on the 99% huh
First off, your freedom to have sex is coupled with a responsibility (i.e. for what sex inevitably leads to). American citizens should not be coerced into financing the murder of your child because you don't want the responsibility and didn't feel like using contraceptives or practicing abstinence.
Second, it's paternalistic to think that 'daddy' state must intervene every time someone reaps what they sows as it pertains to sex (here not talking about the extremely rare cases of rape and incest pregnancies). The mentality amongst the left in the West is that the fruits and consequences of one's recklessness ought to be deferred to the state or to the group.
Third, NGOs make oodles of money squeezing abortion zealots, eugenicists, and political affiliates; they can finance the murder of poor babies, achieving Sanger's goal of culling the lower classes and minorities and also narrowing the accessibility gap. Dick's Sporting Goods is giving $4K to each employee who wants to go cut up their spawn in another state. You can bet your ass ESG ratings will now reflect a listed company's willingness to pay for its employees to go to a blue state to murder their unborn child.
Fourth and final: concerning class (which the 99% rhetoric gets into), abortion is a means of class warfare, by the rich against the poor. Big corporations do not want to pay for a new addition to an employees' healthcare plan. Insurance, after all, is costly. They don't want employees' attention divided. What's more: they want more women in the workforce, not at a home, because this fills the talent pool, and depresses wages (more labor, less employer demand, lower wages needed to attract talent). Abortion, extra to having been Tommy Douglas and Margaret Sanger and the Hitlerite's way of killing off all those walks of human life that they felt unfit (i.e. to hire; here is Sanger at a KKK rally), and the Chinese Communists' way of ensuring they did not have to take on the burden of 750 million souls, has always been a way of regulating the reproduction systems of the poor. Those lefties citing economics as justification for the taking of innocent babies' lives should go about improving the economy rather than offing the next generation.
Nope, still incels. Sexual assault is not sex. Just violence.
Forcing people to up and go to a different state for basic Healthcare is still oppression and will result in many unwanted pregnancies from people totally unprepared for. Plus you can bet it's only going to get worse from here. US really has shown it's true colors as a fascist theocracy