”THE COVID STATISTICS ARE NOT COOKED, THEY ARE INACCURATE”.
~TUCHODI, 2022
You admitted you submitted to an experimental injection after a 4 month trial..
You allowed the Government to experiment on you and you don’t know the long term safety data
You admit vaccine status is irrelevant for the elderly, and admit the triple vaxed are DYING FROM COVID at higher rates.
You agree with Dr Giris. ”The vaccine has “no significance regarding severe illness.” “80% of serious COVID cases are triple vaccinated”, says Prof. Jacob Giris, Director of Israeli Hospital’s coronavirus ward.
The hospitalized triple vaccinated are over represented.
You support giving healthy infants and children 600x increased risk of heart disease for a virus they survive 99.999% of the time.
You endorse an injection that fails 100% of the fully vaccinated in the ICU, and that gives healthy athletes heart disease, all for a virus they survive 99.99%.
Please note the lack of support for the majority of VaxC1's opinions.
The one quote he does back up is not from the person he claims it is because the interview was given in Hebrew. He's relying on some anonymous reporter who is providing a context-free interpretation of the Professor's comments.
Another interpretation of the quote is that because Prof. Jacob Giris works on a ward full of elderly patients with multiple comorbidities those patients do not benefit from covid vaccination the way healthy people do.
Folks, VaxC1 can call me all the names they want. It doesn't change the fact that they virtually never provide any support for the misinformation they're spreading.
And when they do try to support their fantasies it's usually not with science. Instead they prefer anonymous reporters on sketchy web sites, Twitter posts, and the like.
And when they do reference science or something close to it it's mostly to claim they know as much or more than the people who produced it, and are trying to explain why the conclusions of the science people are wrong.
Despite having no relevant training or experience VaxC1 thinks they know stuff.
Doesn't change the fact that the unvaccinated are entering the hospital at a significantly higher rate than vaccinated people.
In Ontario on July 20 2022 the rate per million of covid hospitalizations was 331.4 for unvaccinated people and 86.5 for vaccinated people.
The rates of ICU occupancy for the same groups was 18.8 and 7.6
Unvaccinated people have a higher risk of hospitalization and severe infection than vaccinated people.
https://covid19-sciencetable.ca/ontario-dashboard/
~TUCHODI, 2022
You admitted you submitted to an experimental injection after a 4 month trial..
You allowed the Government to experiment on you and you don’t know the long term safety data
You admit vaccine status is irrelevant for the elderly, and admit the triple vaxed are DYING FROM COVID at higher rates.
You agree with Dr Giris. ”The vaccine has “no significance regarding severe illness.” “80% of serious COVID cases are triple vaccinated”, says Prof. Jacob Giris, Director of Israeli Hospital’s coronavirus ward.
The hospitalized triple vaccinated are over represented.
You support giving healthy infants and children 600x increased risk of heart disease for a virus they survive 99.999% of the time.
You endorse an injection that fails 100% of the fully vaccinated in the ICU, and that gives healthy athletes heart disease, all for a virus they survive 99.99%.
Your opinion is worthless.
Please note the lack of support for the majority of VaxC1's opinions.
The one quote he does back up is not from the person he claims it is because the interview was given in Hebrew. He's relying on some anonymous reporter who is providing a context-free interpretation of the Professor's comments.
Another interpretation of the quote is that because Prof. Jacob Giris works on a ward full of elderly patients with multiple comorbidities those patients do not benefit from covid vaccination the way healthy people do.
Uneducated obese car mechanic says what?
Folks, VaxC1 can call me all the names they want. It doesn't change the fact that they virtually never provide any support for the misinformation they're spreading.
And when they do try to support their fantasies it's usually not with science. Instead they prefer anonymous reporters on sketchy web sites, Twitter posts, and the like.
And when they do reference science or something close to it it's mostly to claim they know as much or more than the people who produced it, and are trying to explain why the conclusions of the science people are wrong.
Despite having no relevant training or experience VaxC1 thinks they know stuff.