4 September 2021 - 7 patients with comorbidity (Multiple Sclerosis), "with five returning to baseline and two approaching baseline" - that is, five recovered and two close to recovered at time of publication.
2021 Nov 9 - 32 cases, half with "a previous immune-mediated disease". Also "This systematic review identified few cases of CNS demyelination following all types of approved COVID-19 vaccines so far. ... Favorable outcome was observed in most cases."
Server not found. Paper found elsewhere (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ene.15147): "Given the assumed low incidence and mostly favourable outcome of autoimmune responses, the benefits of vaccinations out-weigh the comparatively small risks."
B) How many more would have died without the vaccines?
June 23, 2022 "Based on official reported COVID-19 deaths, we estimated that vaccinations prevented 14·4 million (95% credible interval [Crl] 13·7–15·9) deaths from COVID-19 in 185 countries and territories between Dec 8, 2020, and Dec 8, 2021. This estimate rose to 19·8 million (95% Crl 19·1–20·4) deaths from COVID-19 averted when we used excess deaths as an estimate of the true extent of the pandemic, representing a global reduction of 63% in total deaths (19·8 million of 31·4 million) during the first year of COVID-19 vaccination." https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099%2822%2900320-6/fulltext
“recent data from your own link shows that you're more likely to die if you have 3+ doses vs just 2”.
Without researching it I'd guess that's because it's the oldest people that have 3 doses, and we all know covid is hardest on the elderly.
You admit the BOOSTED are DYING at much higher rates.
This is modeling. It’s not official stats. Kind of like Ontario Science Table using modeling to publish misleading stats that were so way off from official Ontario government stats.
You have to be sure that the parameters that are input into your modeling software are correct, first of all.
Dozens of assumptions were based on this modeling study, like this one for example:
we assume that all vaccinated individuals have a 50% reduction in infectiousness for breakthrough infections.
50% reduction in infectiousness is way off.
Still, so many vaccinated people continue to die from covid. It’s too bad. The vaccines had so much promise.
My favorite from the list is delirium.
Server not found. Paper not found elsewhere.
4 September 2021 - 7 patients with comorbidity (Multiple Sclerosis), "with five returning to baseline and two approaching baseline" - that is, five recovered and two close to recovered at time of publication.
Server not found. Paper found elsewhere: (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165572821002927)
2021 Nov 9 - 32 cases, half with "a previous immune-mediated disease". Also "This systematic review identified few cases of CNS demyelination following all types of approved COVID-19 vaccines so far. ... Favorable outcome was observed in most cases."
Server not found. Paper not found elsewhere.
Server not found. Paper found elsewhere (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ene.15147): "Given the assumed low incidence and mostly favourable outcome of autoimmune responses, the benefits of vaccinations out-weigh the comparatively small risks."
Server not found. Paper found elsewhere (https://www.mdpi.com/2076-393X/10/6/961/htm)
"the incidence of SAEs [Serious Adverse Effects] is not different than that expected in a worldwide campaign"
"Key concepts
Etc.
So far nothing much compared to six million deaths.
That's a lot of people that the covid vaccine failed.
A) You figure they were all vaccinated, eh?
B) How many more would have died without the vaccines?
June 23, 2022 "Based on official reported COVID-19 deaths, we estimated that vaccinations prevented 14·4 million (95% credible interval [Crl] 13·7–15·9) deaths from COVID-19 in 185 countries and territories between Dec 8, 2020, and Dec 8, 2021. This estimate rose to 19·8 million (95% Crl 19·1–20·4) deaths from COVID-19 averted when we used excess deaths as an estimate of the true extent of the pandemic, representing a global reduction of 63% in total deaths (19·8 million of 31·4 million) during the first year of COVID-19 vaccination." https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099%2822%2900320-6/fulltext
You admitted you are more likely to die if you get boosted:
https://omegacanada.win/p/15IrGIVyaa/vaccine-status-is-irrelevant--ol/c/
And urultrafucked is refusing the booster.
See if you can spot the difference folks...
What I said:
What V&C1 says I said:
V&C1 likes to twist things.
Tuchodi quote in full:
You admit the BOOSTED are DYING at much higher rates.
I admit that people wearing seat belts die in car accidents too. What's your point?
This is modeling. It’s not official stats. Kind of like Ontario Science Table using modeling to publish misleading stats that were so way off from official Ontario government stats.
You have to be sure that the parameters that are input into your modeling software are correct, first of all.
Dozens of assumptions were based on this modeling study, like this one for example:
50% reduction in infectiousness is way off.
Still, so many vaccinated people continue to die from covid. It’s too bad. The vaccines had so much promise.
Do you have even the tiniest little link to back up your opinions and quotes? That would be so nice.
Still can't accept that it isn't 100% perfect, eh?
You believed the “CDC when it lied to you and promised you, quote: ‘the vaccinated could not carry the virus, don’t get sick, not just in clinical trials but also in real world data’,”. That’s how dumb, uneducated and gullible you are.
You were terrified of a flu that has a 99.9% survival rate and you chose vaccine induced heart disease over it.
YOU ARE VAXED! CONTAGIOUS AND AT HIGHER RISK OF DEATH TUCHODI BY YOUR OWN ADMISSION, NOTHING YOU SAY WILL MAKE IT NOT TRUE
Your unsupported opinions are a matter of record. Repeatedly.
You need a link to back up that vaccinated people are dying from covid? Geez. Play dumb more.
I repeat: Still can't accept that it isn't 100% perfect, eh?
It sucks. I'd be happy if we had a decent covid vaccine. We were promised so much.
Why are you wasting time calling me names? Get in touch with The Lancet and explain to them where their scientists are wrong..