16
Comments (22)
sorted by:
1
DoggyDawg 1 point ago +1 / -0

My favorite from the list is delirium.

-5
tuchodi -5 points ago +2 / -7

Spectrum of neurological complications following COVID-19 vaccination: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/labs/pmc/articles/PMC8557950/

Server not found. Paper not found elsewhere.

COVID-19 mRNA vaccination leading to CNS inflammation: a case series https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00415-021-10780-7

4 September 2021 - 7 patients with comorbidity (Multiple Sclerosis), "with five returning to baseline and two approaching baseline" - that is, five recovered and two close to recovered at time of publication.

A systematic review of cases of CNS demyelination following COVID-19 vaccination: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34839149/

Server not found. Paper found elsewhere: (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165572821002927)

2021 Nov 9 - 32 cases, half with "a previous immune-mediated disease". Also "This systematic review identified few cases of CNS demyelination following all types of approved COVID-19 vaccines so far. ... Favorable outcome was observed in most cases."

Spectrum of neuroimaging findings in post-covid-19 vaccination: a case series and review of the literature: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34842783/

Server not found. Paper not found elsewhere.

Neurologic autoimmune diseases following vaccinations: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34668274/

Server not found. Paper found elsewhere (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ene.15147): "Given the assumed low incidence and mostly favourable outcome of autoimmune responses, the benefits of vaccinations out-weigh the comparatively small risks."

New-onset autoimmune phenomena post COVID-19 vaccination: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34957554/

Server not found. Paper found elsewhere (https://www.mdpi.com/2076-393X/10/6/961/htm)

"the incidence of SAEs [Serious Adverse Effects] is not different than that expected in a worldwide campaign"

"Key concepts

AEs [Adverse Effects] are generally mild or moderate.

Albeit very infrequently, there can be SAEs that need to be paid attention to."

Etc.

So far nothing much compared to six million deaths.

4
DoggyDawg 4 points ago +4 / -0

six million deaths

That's a lot of people that the covid vaccine failed.

-5
tuchodi -5 points ago +2 / -7

A) You figure they were all vaccinated, eh?

B) How many more would have died without the vaccines?

June 23, 2022 "Based on official reported COVID-19 deaths, we estimated that vaccinations prevented 14·4 million (95% credible interval [Crl] 13·7–15·9) deaths from COVID-19 in 185 countries and territories between Dec 8, 2020, and Dec 8, 2021. This estimate rose to 19·8 million (95% Crl 19·1–20·4) deaths from COVID-19 averted when we used excess deaths as an estimate of the true extent of the pandemic, representing a global reduction of 63% in total deaths (19·8 million of 31·4 million) during the first year of COVID-19 vaccination." https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099%2822%2900320-6/fulltext

6
VaxedAndContagious1 6 points ago +6 / -0

You admitted you are more likely to die if you get boosted:

https://omegacanada.win/p/15IrGIVyaa/vaccine-status-is-irrelevant--ol/c/

And urultrafucked is refusing the booster.

-6
tuchodi -6 points ago +1 / -7

See if you can spot the difference folks...

What I said:

it's the oldest people that have 3 doses, and we all know covid is hardest on the elderly.

What V&C1 says I said:

you are more likely to die if you get boosted

V&C1 likes to twist things.

4
VaxedAndContagious1 4 points ago +4 / -0

Tuchodi quote in full:

“recent data from your own link shows that you're more likely to die if you have 3+ doses vs just 2”. Without researching it I'd guess that's because it's the oldest people that have 3 doses, and we all know covid is hardest on the elderly.

You admit the BOOSTED are DYING at much higher rates.

-6
tuchodi -6 points ago +1 / -7

I admit that people wearing seat belts die in car accidents too. What's your point?

3
DoggyDawg 3 points ago +3 / -0

This is modeling. It’s not official stats. Kind of like Ontario Science Table using modeling to publish misleading stats that were so way off from official Ontario government stats.

You have to be sure that the parameters that are input into your modeling software are correct, first of all.

Dozens of assumptions were based on this modeling study, like this one for example:

we assume that all vaccinated individuals have a 50% reduction in infectiousness for breakthrough infections.

50% reduction in infectiousness is way off.

Still, so many vaccinated people continue to die from covid. It’s too bad. The vaccines had so much promise.

-6
tuchodi -6 points ago +1 / -7

Do you have even the tiniest little link to back up your opinions and quotes? That would be so nice.

Still, so many vaccinated people continue to die from covid

Still can't accept that it isn't 100% perfect, eh?

4
VaxedAndContagious1 4 points ago +4 / -0
-6
tuchodi -6 points ago +1 / -7

Your unsupported opinions are a matter of record. Repeatedly.

1
DoggyDawg 1 point ago +1 / -0

You need a link to back up that vaccinated people are dying from covid? Geez. Play dumb more.

-6
tuchodi -6 points ago +1 / -7

I repeat: Still can't accept that it isn't 100% perfect, eh?

1
DoggyDawg 1 point ago +1 / -0

It sucks. I'd be happy if we had a decent covid vaccine. We were promised so much.

2
Bannonmeharder 2 points ago +2 / -0

Suck a tail pipe. You know you are wrong yet you who admits to being a car mechanic will repeatedly promote fraud and harm to others based on lies.

You are a clown.
Get fucked you piece of trash

-6
tuchodi -6 points ago +1 / -7

Why are you wasting time calling me names? Get in touch with The Lancet and explain to them where their scientists are wrong..