Correlation is not causation. If you don't know what that means look it up.
Again, i have to quote you due to your history of editing your comments after i destroy them.
Oh my… did you just learn a new stats term? You don’t even understand the term you just learned and you’re already quoting it.
YOU should probably look this up. Correlation does not necessarily mean causation. But it could and often does point to causation. It’s the starting point of so many scientific studies.
Speculating is the start of the process, genius. Inquiring minds progress science. Nevertheless, you told someone to lookup correlation vs causation. Don’t deflect. You don’t understand this. You need to look this up yourself.
Again, i have to quote you due to your history of editing your comments after i destroy them.
Oh my… did you just learn a new stats term? You don’t even understand the term you just learned and you’re already quoting it.
YOU should probably look this up. Correlation does not necessarily mean causation. But it could and often does point to causation. It’s the starting point of so many scientific studies.
tuchodi seems to have an iq that is hovering around the 80 to 85 level, ie. borderline mildlly retarded
And until we get there, do them, and publish the results it's good to remember that correlation is not causation.
Alexander should be working on those studies, not speculating.
Speculating is the start of the process, genius. Inquiring minds progress science. Nevertheless, you told someone to lookup correlation vs causation. Don’t deflect. You don’t understand this. You need to look this up yourself.
You appear to skipping the research and proof part of science.
You would think that only if you’re clueless about stats and science.
This is YOUR quote. This is wrong. You’re deflecting.