Two very different term with different meanings. One is right. One is wrong.
You misunderstood what correlation vs causation means, as usual with your comprehension of stats and science concepts. You can’t edit your original comment, which is your go-to strategy in theses circumstances and now you’re trying too hard.
Anyone who - like DoggyDawg - is confused about the difference between correlation and causation can read up on the subject: https://duckduckgo.com/?t=ffab&q=Correlation+is+not+causation&ia=web
Two very different term with different meanings. One is right. One is wrong.
You misunderstood what correlation vs causation means, as usual with your comprehension of stats and science concepts. You can’t edit your original comment, which is your go-to strategy in theses circumstances and now you’re trying too hard.
Only according to you. Anyone who - like you - is confused about the difference between correlation and causation can read up on the subject: https://duckduckgo.com/?t=ffab&q=Correlation+is+not+causation&ia=web
“Imply” is not the same thing as “does not.” I’m not going to explain it to you because you won’t get it anyway.
The explanations in the links above are pretty clear, and they show Alexander's page to be nothing more than a shitpost.