Folks, on one of the rare occasions when V&C1 lowers themself to attempting to provide some sort of proof for their fantasies you should not be surprised to find that the source is barely supermarket checkout quality.
It's about an anonymous child "allegedly in the hospital due to myocarditis", his anonymous father, and an anonymous pharmacist, and it may have happened in New Zealand or New York.
On the "Real Science" scale this rates a 0 out of 10.
You are correct. The funny thing, though, is the hypocrisy that comes out of your mouth. You recently posted a modeling study as proof that covid vaccines saved 6 million lives… a modeling study… the type of study not based on science or real stats whatsoever, the type of study that is inherently biased, the type of study that a company like Pfizer would fund to get published, making it barely checkout quality.
Play dumb. I'm not gonna look through your post history. It was recent. I pointed out the stupidity of it when you posted it. You know what I'm talking about.
https://republicbroadcasting.org/news/bombshell-recorded-call-with-a-pharmacist-father-of-child-with-myocarditis-confronts-jabber/
Folks, on one of the rare occasions when V&C1 lowers themself to attempting to provide some sort of proof for their fantasies you should not be surprised to find that the source is barely supermarket checkout quality.
It's about an anonymous child "allegedly in the hospital due to myocarditis", his anonymous father, and an anonymous pharmacist, and it may have happened in New Zealand or New York.
On the "Real Science" scale this rates a 0 out of 10.
Read it yourself: https://republicbroadcasting.org/news/bombshell-recorded-call-with-a-pharmacist-father-of-child-with-myocarditis-confronts-jabber/
You are correct. The funny thing, though, is the hypocrisy that comes out of your mouth. You recently posted a modeling study as proof that covid vaccines saved 6 million lives… a modeling study… the type of study not based on science or real stats whatsoever, the type of study that is inherently biased, the type of study that a company like Pfizer would fund to get published, making it barely checkout quality.
No link of course.
That would show that it came from people with names they aren't afraid to publish.
Play dumb. I'm not gonna look through your post history. It was recent. I pointed out the stupidity of it when you posted it. You know what I'm talking about.
I found it online, so it must be true, amirite?