Tell me more about the part where the study says "in all cases, symptoms were mild with full recovery within 14 days." and why the conversation is all about Reuters instead of the fact that nothing serious - compared to, say, catching the virus - happened to these youths.
And I am pointing out that you copy pasted misinformation.
You, along with the Reuters individual fact checking medical data, spread misinformation.
That should alarm you.
I’m asking you to stop copy pasting misinformation. Your sanctimonious ignorance is why I downvote you.
There is nothing “mild” about heart ischemia or myopericarditis in children. That is misinformation.
Nothing about high cardiac enzymes in children is mild. The treatment and long term care for teens diagnosed by echocardiogram with vaccine induced heart failure is without parallel for such a young age. Their cardiac markers, vitals and EKG will be normalized by time of discharge, but you think a normalized EKG is the definition of “recovered”. It is not.
These teens are sent to specialty after ICU discharge, with rigorous follow ups every 30 days in pediatric cardiology.
To accept that a flu shot keeps sending healthy teens to the ICU for heart disease is unheard of.
Everything I put in quotation marks was from the pre-print about the study. Nothing came from Reuters.
Reuters is making a distinction between, on the one hand, strictly cardio events as determined by ECG - "while an abnormal ECG finding was noted in 54 patients (17.94%)" [from the study] while on the other hand the hair-on-fire people have to include the fever, palpitation, chest pain, shortness of breath, and headache symptoms to bump the percentage up.
My main point is that - as far as this study goes - nothing of any consequence happened. The study is full of comments about how mild the few effects were:
"The clinical course was mild in all patients"
"each case had mild symptoms"
"mRNA vaccine-related myocarditis is characterized by overall mild presentation and favorable outcomes"
" In this study, the disease course was mild in all of our patients with cardiac symptoms; they were treated with Ibuprofen for 2 weeks and cardiac enzymes returned to normal after 1–2 weeks of outpatient treatment."
"in all cases, symptoms were mild with full recovery within 14 days"
OP is pretending to warn about threats that - according to this study - do not amount to much.
the statistics reflect a 0.1 % of unvaccinated deaths are under 20 in Canada. it was under 50 dead. I saw some of the kids who had supposedly died, they were fat as fuck. If you are a healthy child you risk of death is 0
Tell me more about the part where the study says "in all cases, symptoms were mild with full recovery within 14 days." and why the conversation is all about Reuters instead of the fact that nothing serious - compared to, say, catching the virus - happened to these youths.
The title of this post is correct.
And I am pointing out that you copy pasted misinformation.
You, along with the Reuters individual fact checking medical data, spread misinformation.
That should alarm you.
I’m asking you to stop copy pasting misinformation. Your sanctimonious ignorance is why I downvote you.
There is nothing “mild” about heart ischemia or myopericarditis in children. That is misinformation.
Nothing about high cardiac enzymes in children is mild. The treatment and long term care for teens diagnosed by echocardiogram with vaccine induced heart failure is without parallel for such a young age. Their cardiac markers, vitals and EKG will be normalized by time of discharge, but you think a normalized EKG is the definition of “recovered”. It is not.
These teens are sent to specialty after ICU discharge, with rigorous follow ups every 30 days in pediatric cardiology. To accept that a flu shot keeps sending healthy teens to the ICU for heart disease is unheard of.
Everything I put in quotation marks was from the pre-print about the study. Nothing came from Reuters.
Reuters is making a distinction between, on the one hand, strictly cardio events as determined by ECG - "while an abnormal ECG finding was noted in 54 patients (17.94%)" [from the study] while on the other hand the hair-on-fire people have to include the fever, palpitation, chest pain, shortness of breath, and headache symptoms to bump the percentage up.
My main point is that - as far as this study goes - nothing of any consequence happened. The study is full of comments about how mild the few effects were:
"The clinical course was mild in all patients"
"each case had mild symptoms"
"mRNA vaccine-related myocarditis is characterized by overall mild presentation and favorable outcomes"
" In this study, the disease course was mild in all of our patients with cardiac symptoms; they were treated with Ibuprofen for 2 weeks and cardiac enzymes returned to normal after 1–2 weeks of outpatient treatment."
"in all cases, symptoms were mild with full recovery within 14 days"
OP is pretending to warn about threats that - according to this study - do not amount to much.
lol. A 13 to to 18 year old catching “the virus” would be serious. Again with your fantasies.
I'm assuming you don't know how many of them have died. Perhaps you'd like to talk to their parents?
How many in Canada? How many in the world, do you figure?
the statistics reflect a 0.1 % of unvaccinated deaths are under 20 in Canada. it was under 50 dead. I saw some of the kids who had supposedly died, they were fat as fuck. If you are a healthy child you risk of death is 0
Got a link?
Tell me how many died.
How many is too many?