The numbers are out there. You haven't bothered to look them up so you have half an idea what you're talking about.
That's odd. Just a few days ago you were bullshitting me that the authors of the modeling study that you posted could not do a stats-based study because there were no stats.
Because modeling who might have died of covid but didn't - instead of using the stats you claim they should have but can't produce - is exactly the same as counting the bodies of dead kids.
That would be the data you want them to use but can't produce.
But back to the topic at hand, which you keep slithering away from. I repeat: The numbers are out there. You haven't bothered to look them up so you have half an idea what you're talking about.
But you don't need them. Not knowing what you're talking about is not a problem for you.
That's odd. Just a few days ago you were bullshitting me that the authors of the modeling study that you posted could not do a stats-based study because there were no stats.
Because modeling who might have died of covid but didn't - instead of using the stats you claim they should have but can't produce - is exactly the same as counting the bodies of dead kids.
If you say so...
Modeling who might have died is better than actual data. Right.
That would be the data you want them to use but can't produce.
But back to the topic at hand, which you keep slithering away from. I repeat: The numbers are out there. You haven't bothered to look them up so you have half an idea what you're talking about.
But you don't need them. Not knowing what you're talking about is not a problem for you.
Fine.
Last word to you.
And you're the one who's always moaning about deflection.
When it’s appropriate to ridicule the hypocrisy.
"Rules for thee, but not for me"
Not surprised.
Back to the topic at hand: it's clear you do not know or need to know how many youth have died. Your mind is made up.
Over and out.