"This week, my colleague and friend Sally Fallon Morell brought to my attention an amazing article put out by the CDC. The link to the article is here, and it was published in June 2020. The purpose of the article was for a group of about 20 virologists to describe the state of the science of the isolation, purification and biological characteristics of the new SARS-CoV-2 virus, and to share this information with other scientists for their own research. A thorough and careful reading of this important paper reveals some shocking findings.
First, in the section titled “Whole Genome Sequencing,” we find that rather than having isolated the virus and sequencing the genome from end to end, that the CDC “designed 37 pairs of nested PCRs spanning the genome on the basis of the coronavirus reference sequence (GenBank accession no. NC045512).”
To me, this computer-generation step constitutes scientific fraud. Here is an equivalency: A group of researchers claim to have found a unicorn because they found a piece of a hoof, a hair from a tail, and a snippet of a horn. They then add that information into a computer and program it to re-create the unicorn, and they then claim this computer re-creation is the real unicorn. Of course, they had never actually seen a unicorn so could not possibly have examined its genetic makeup to compare their samples with the actual unicorn’s hair, hooves and horn.
The researchers claim they decided which is the real genome of SARS-CoV-2 by “consensus,” sort of like a vote. Again, different computer programs will come up with different versions of the imaginary “unicorn,” so they come together as a group and decide which is the real imaginary unicorn."
"Follow the $Cience." "The $Cience evolved". "Trust the experts" they said. Disregard the long accepted "scientific method".
That's what all doctors should do unless they are familiar with the individual patient and are aware of their medical history. That is a responsible statement. The promoters of an experimental gene therapy who have vested interest in selling a product will be held accountable.
https://drtomcowan.com/blogs/blog/only-poisoned-monkey-kidney-cells-grew-the-virus?_pos=1&_psq=only-poisoned-monkey-kidney-cells-grew-the-virus%2F&_ss=e&_v=1.0
"This week, my colleague and friend Sally Fallon Morell brought to my attention an amazing article put out by the CDC. The link to the article is here, and it was published in June 2020. The purpose of the article was for a group of about 20 virologists to describe the state of the science of the isolation, purification and biological characteristics of the new SARS-CoV-2 virus, and to share this information with other scientists for their own research. A thorough and careful reading of this important paper reveals some shocking findings.
First, in the section titled “Whole Genome Sequencing,” we find that rather than having isolated the virus and sequencing the genome from end to end, that the CDC “designed 37 pairs of nested PCRs spanning the genome on the basis of the coronavirus reference sequence (GenBank accession no. NC045512).”
To me, this computer-generation step constitutes scientific fraud. Here is an equivalency: A group of researchers claim to have found a unicorn because they found a piece of a hoof, a hair from a tail, and a snippet of a horn. They then add that information into a computer and program it to re-create the unicorn, and they then claim this computer re-creation is the real unicorn. Of course, they had never actually seen a unicorn so could not possibly have examined its genetic makeup to compare their samples with the actual unicorn’s hair, hooves and horn.
The researchers claim they decided which is the real genome of SARS-CoV-2 by “consensus,” sort of like a vote. Again, different computer programs will come up with different versions of the imaginary “unicorn,” so they come together as a group and decide which is the real imaginary unicorn."
"Follow the $Cience." "The $Cience evolved". "Trust the experts" they said. Disregard the long accepted "scientific method".
From your link: "Dr. Tom Cowan LLC does not provide medical advice, diagnosis or treatment." https://drtomcowan.com/blogs/blog/only-poisoned-monkey-kidney-cells-grew-the-virus?_pos=1&_psq=only-poisoned-monkey-kidney-cells-grew-the-virus%2F&_ss=e&_v=1.0
That's what all doctors should do unless they are familiar with the individual patient and are aware of their medical history. That is a responsible statement. The promoters of an experimental gene therapy who have vested interest in selling a product will be held accountable.
Don't take medical advice from him.