The people who DO have the credentials say that their study indicates there isn't much difference between the rates of serious adverse events for the BNT162b2 vaccinations and the rates of non–SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations. Furthermore the paper points out that it appears hospitalizations can be eliminated by using the lower doses of BNT162b2.
But Jim Holt needs the advertising revenue, so he doesn't say "SAEs with BNT162b2 vaccinations are comparable with non–SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations., and for BNT162b2 and hospitalizations do not occur with a lower dose", like the actual experts do.
No. He sets his hair on fire and runs around screaming, and bozos like you lap it up.
The Covid Nazi who said he was an obese car mechanic and who admitted being uneducated, with no math or science education and who relies on google search words and POLITICO to take medical decisions, is criticizing someone else’s credentials.
.
The same obese car mechanic, terrified of a flu with 99.99% survival, who is pushing experimental mRNA in healthy infants and children, and who supports mandating transient sterility …… is criticizing someone’s credentials.
Unable to understand the content. You attack the publisher. Proof just how stupid you are, Covid Nazi
Folks, V&C1 can't see that I'm comparing Jim Holt's lack of credentials in the relevant field to those of the people with applicable training and experience, plus access to data .
Who are you going to listen to? The experts? or Jim Holt?
The experts? Or goofballs like V&C1?
Who you choose says a lot about your ability to think clearly.
Folks, at least the people I quote are experts, and the fact that she thinks they're lying says a lot about her. If you bother to look up her quotes - and you almost always have to because she rarely says where she got them - you won't find many subject matter experts. And when you do they're usually not saying what she says they are. I suspect she knows that, and that's why she doesn't provide links.
Jim Hoft has no medical credentials.
None.
The people who DO have the credentials say that their study indicates there isn't much difference between the rates of serious adverse events for the BNT162b2 vaccinations and the rates of non–SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations. Furthermore the paper points out that it appears hospitalizations can be eliminated by using the lower doses of BNT162b2.
But Jim Holt needs the advertising revenue, so he doesn't say "SAEs with BNT162b2 vaccinations are comparable with non–SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations., and for BNT162b2 and hospitalizations do not occur with a lower dose", like the actual experts do.
No. He sets his hair on fire and runs around screaming, and bozos like you lap it up.
Here's the study: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2797451 Read it yourself.
.
Unable to understand the content. You attack the publisher. Proof just how stupid you are, Covid Nazi
Folks, V&C1 can't see that I'm comparing Jim Holt's lack of credentials in the relevant field to those of the people with applicable training and experience, plus access to data .
Who are you going to listen to? The experts? or Jim Holt?
The experts? Or goofballs like V&C1?
Who you choose says a lot about your ability to think clearly.
You posted a fraudulent Washington State Government report hiding all triple vaxed hospitalization.
Lol
Keep posting your lying experts and keep following their science! Go boost yourself Covid Nazi!!
Folks, at least the people I quote are experts, and the fact that she thinks they're lying says a lot about her. If you bother to look up her quotes - and you almost always have to because she rarely says where she got them - you won't find many subject matter experts. And when you do they're usually not saying what she says they are. I suspect she knows that, and that's why she doesn't provide links.