Interesting, eh? The areas of the States less likely to be vaccinated are the ones with more excess deaths.
Edit 1: add a link: https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w30512/w30512.pdf
Comments (30)
sorted by:
This only makes you look like a deranged double masked FarLefist TwoChodes. Misinformation at its finest. You copy paste a title and have no ability to understand the math or the content,
As always, the Covid Nazi copy pastes links that hide ALL data of vaccine status. And Hides all double, and triple vaccinated Covid Hospitalizations and hides double and triple vaccinated Covid Deaths.
The vaccine status of all these “Republicans” deaths are hidden
This study hides all the FULLY VACCINATED breakthrough Covid Infections after Jan 2022:
What V&C1 is trying to say, folks, in her own ham-fisted, semi-literate way, is that she wants you to believe there is hidden data.
You have to take her word for this, because she can't produce it herself. You know: "The fact that there's no proof is proof".
Yeah no info on mortality cause or associated mortality just opinion based reporting.
This could be anything including most medical folks are liberals and hospital policies foment ventilators and harse treatments like that but liberals knew this caused adverse deaths. So did they protect the like minded but "let the others go". Maybe the treatment was different vaxed vs unvaxed (at one point ventilators were only being assigned to unvaxed as it was believed the vaxed could not catch COVID so treatment was different leading to excess deaths in unvaxed to "prove a point" possibly?).
As you've said before there's a lot of nuance.
"What did he die of?"
"What was he registered as?"
Where is the opinion?
"What did he die of?"
"What was he registered as?"
“How many Covid vaccines did the deceased get.”
“How many Covid vaccines did the registered Democrat have when he died of Covid”?
TWOCHODES LYING AND HIDING DATA AGAIN
cc: u/bobbydriscolsgoat/
Don't expect her to make sense folks.
TWOCHODES ERRATUM
The opinion piece that TwoChodes copy pasted also shows that:
FULLY VACCINATED DEMOCRAT voters in California and in New York DIED from Covid Infections at a much higher rate than Florida Republicans.
Just check the opinion piece TwoChodes pasted and search for VACCINE STATUS COVID DEATHS*
She's entitled to her opinions folks.
Too bad she ha no proof.
Please upvote her. She needs your validation, poor thing.
You get "Phrase not found"
See folks? She just makes shit up...
There's no context to "died of".
Generally speaking you die "with" COVID and another issue leads to your death. Very few people die "of" COVID.
Kind of like people don't die of "suddenly".
So you think that if Grandma dies because she has covid, and she wouldn't have died without it, but she didn't die of covid, then it doesn't count?
Well it's best to know when a nurse may go rougue:https://toronto.ctvnews.ca/mobile/nurse-charged-after-long-term-care-home-investigation-in-brampton-1.5468632
They aren't immune to psychopathy
And combining death stats is a great way to lie to people: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/cdc-director-walensky-criticism-updated-guidance-coronavirus-deaths
Your 18 month old news article references three anonymous Twitter users - plus "others", also anonymous - who don't like her attempt to clarify the situation.
Plus you, of course.
Not exactly a shit-storm is it?
Meanwhile, I'm waiting to hear what you think about Grandma.
You seem to be dodging the question. It's about dying of vs dying with.
Grandma is healthy. She gets covid and it knocks her flat. In her weakened condition she dies from an opportunistic infection that would not normally have taken her out.
She's dead. Tell me you do not believe she should be counted as a covid death.
As for your rogue nurse: what does 11 murdered LTC people have to do with tens of thousands of extra dead people in Canada?
Interesting? It’s interesting that you are attributing correlation in a specifically targeted subset of the population to the vaccine.
They studied just two specifically targeted states, Florida and Ohio. If you want to create a biased study, go directly to the area where your bias will be confirmed and extrapolate it to the population as a whole.
And it’s been like this for decades before covid. But it’s suddenly due to vaccines now, amirite?
Yes. This is an individual-level study and as such avoids the "ecological fallacy". Studies that look at US counties as opposed to individuals are showing the same results: July 18, 2022 "Democrat-leaning “blue” states were more likely to enact mask requirements and vaccine and social distancing mandates. Republican-leaning “red” states were much more resistant to health measures. The consequences of those differences emerged by the end of 2020, when rates of hospitalization and death from COVID rose in conservative counties and dropped in liberal ones." https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/people-in-republican-counties-have-higher-death-rates-than-those-in-democratic-counties/
No. "We do not observe a statistically significant association between the county-level vaccination rate and the Republican-Democrat excess death gap until after the vaccine is widely available" In other words it showed that excess mortality figures remained the same between Republicans and Democrats until the vaccines came out. After that the Republicans started to die off at a higher rate.
Right. And you're still implying that it was due to vaccines. It could be due to vaccines, it could be due to masks, it could be due to social distancing, it could be due to a combination, or it could be due to something else entirely.
You saw a correlation and implied that it was due to vaccines. You have a bias and see what you want to see.
Take it up with Jacob Wallace, Paul Goldsmith-Pinkham, and Jason L. Schwartz. They're the people who wrote the paper.
Let us know what they say in response to your observations.
It’s a politically biased report. I already know where they stand.
"My mind is made up. Don't confuse me with the facts."
It's an old story folks.
Facts? You posted a report. Not a scientific study. Not something that will be peer-reviewed. A politically biased report. This is the second stupidest post that you made, eclipsed only by the pharma-funded modeling study.
It's pretty simple folks. Look at the individuals who died of covid, and look up their voter registration in the two states that allow you to.. Hmmm, so many Repuclicans, so many Democrats. Oh look! After the vaccines became available Republicans were dying at a higher rate.
"This study constructs an individual-level dataset with political affiliation and excess death rates during the COVID-19 pandemic via a linkage of 2017 voter registration in Ohio and Florida to mortality data from 2018 to 2021. We estimate substantially higher excess death rates for registered Republicans when compared to registered Democrats, with almost all of the difference concentrated in the period after vaccines were widely available in our study states. Overall, the excess death rate for Republicans was 5.4 percentage points (pp), or 76%, higher than the excess death rate for Democrats. Post- vaccines, the excess death rate gap between Republicans and Democrats widened from 1.6 pp (22% of the Democrat excess death rate) to 10.4 pp (153% of the Democrat excess death rate). The gap in excess death rates between Republicans and Democrats is concentrated in counties with low vaccination rates and only materializes after vaccines became widely available." https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w30512/w30512.pdf
This bears out at an individual level what all those larger studies were showing:
National Bureau of Economic Research: September 2022 "The gap in excess death rates between Republicans and Democrats is concentrated in counties with low vaccination rates and only materializes after vaccines became widely available." https://www.nber.org/papers/w30512
Health Affairs Journal: June 2022 "Majority Republican counties experienced 72.9 additional deaths per 100,000 people relative to majority Democratic counties" https://www.healthaffairs.org/doi/full/10.1377/hlthaff.2022.00085
Scientific American: July 18, 2022 "although the highly transmissible Omicron variant narrowed the gap in infection rates, hospitalization and death rates, which are dramatically reduced by vaccines, remain higher in Republican-leaning parts of the country" https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/people-in-republican-counties-have-higher-death-rates-than-those-in-democratic-counties/
National Bureau of Economic Research: September 2022 "The gap in excess death rates between Republicans and Democrats is concentrated in counties with low vaccination rates and only materializes after vaccines became widely available." https://www.nber.org/papers/w30512
Health Affairs Journal: June 2022 "Majority Republican counties experienced 72.9 additional deaths per 100,000 people relative to majority Democratic counties" https://www.healthaffairs.org/doi/full/10.1377/hlthaff.2022.00085
Scientific American: July 18, 2022 "although the highly transmissible Omicron variant narrowed the gap in infection rates, hospitalization and death rates, which are dramatically reduced by vaccines, remain higher in Republican-leaning parts of the country" https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/people-in-republican-counties-have-higher-death-rates-than-those-in-democratic-counties/
Misinformation gets downvoted here.
Folks, V&C1 prefers to present information year-old from Alex Berenson, AKA "The Pandemic’s Wrongest Man" https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2021/04/pandemics-wrongest-man/618475/
See https://omegacanada.win/p/15K6lVKOK8/death-by-vaccinated-status--vacc/