I find it interesting when actors use terms like "surround" and "safe from us". As if to give credence to rhetoric that seeks to escalate.
These are mostly peaceful protesters. He should feel safe with that very heavy police presence and I doubt that he's "surrounded".
India required local validation of efficacy. Pfizer did not wish to have independent local testing under the watchful gaze of the Indian government.
Demyelination is the basis of many divergent side effects including aphasia and MS.
It does come back over time. But never get a other shot unless people are dying in the street.
I have heard that ivermectin does an amazing job of killing off the runaway spike proteins and kills the parasites that get an easy foothold after the immune killing effects of the jabs.
But that's just hearsay you should ask a doctor you know. Make friends and be someone that they can trust. There is hope even if you were coerced to take the jabs.
I guess you've never done something physical like making a mural or anything like that.
It takes a village sometimes.
A settlement is not a precident - the pay outs were never tested in court and could easily fail if tested by a new government and taken to a full court.
When government settles a case they are not admitting that the case had merit, just that they lacked the fortitude to challenge it on behalf of the Canadian people.
In truth a settlement by government is a loss of national security in that they are subverting the rights of taxpayers to a fair trial when sued. They are risking sovereign rights doing it.
Basically "IAM Coward"
Not surprising considering the time that Tommy was part of:
Grant withdrew from Manitoba and returned to Saskatchewan where he campaigned for the Klan against Premier James Gardiner and the Liberal Party in the 1929 provincial election. After the Anderson Conservative Party victory, Grant was given a job in charge of the Weyburn Employment Bureau. Soon after the Liberal Party’s return to power in 1934, Grant was sacked from his job. However, in 1935 he came into prominence once again as one of Tommy Douglas’ Co-operative Commonwealth Federation campaign workers in the federal election of that year. 
Tommy used his hatred of the Catholic Church to nationalise the medical system and ousted the nuns from benevolence society work thus removing the Catholic hospital system.
I always felt that socialism was just a pretty face to racism and used reverse rhetoric or lies to get the general population to believe that socialists were doing work on their behalf when in fact they were manned by racists.
Subsequent testing was based on omicron which has long transitioned out of view and each of these so called studies was funded by questionable sources including FTX, who embesseled billions from investors. If a company is willing to embessel i would think that all the fruits of that poison tree are suspect.
The gene therapy sold as COVID vaccines were not designed to stop transmission.
It's a lie to say that you reduce risk to others if you are vaccinated.
Next stage imperialism.
The art of war:
Chapter 11: The Nine Situations
Certain grounds should not be involved in the conflict: dispersive ground - ground within one's land frontier ground - just inside enemy lines key ground - ground that is advantageous to both sides. Skilled troops should fight on the following lands: communicating ground - fortified land focal ground - land surrounded by three other states or potential allies. far inside enemy territory. Lands to avoid include: difficult grounds - rough terrain or swift rivers #encircled ground - being pushed into difficult terrain by the enemy death ground - desperate situations.
I think that they are converting focal grounds to frontier grounds over time
What I mean is if i use the same data source i can pull the incidence of cancer, diabetes, hypertension etc for the vaxed vs unvaxed.
Im going to take a look. Sadly behind a privacy wall: https://www.ices.on.ca/About-ICES/ICES-Contacts-and-Sites
Oh btw it's no surprise unvaxed have a greater incident of alcoholism. Just look at the way they were treated for the last two years.
Holy do you see the comparisons of yes vs no evals? You are more that double the risk of cancer diagnosis (hidden in 'cancer-no') than vaccinated groups values.
No if they broke this data into age groups and status with matched populations randomly selected you would see some scary stats.
Same for all the other -no determinatives compared.
When proving a comparison the cohorts should match. 84% of the study participants were vaccinated so cherry picking results can occur.
The Lancet announced that the article used to create the jab injury "long COVID" cover story data is under review (which means possible . fabrication).
Guess who funded this bogus study:
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences National Science and Technology Major Project
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences
National Natural Science Foundation of China
National Key Research and Development Program of China
So much for the science.
Those extra voices in your head agree?
Tell them to get their own account.
This doesn't masquerade the fact that a few very powerful figures enforce their beliefs on millions of healthcare workers with threats to their livelihood. It's a cult.
An argument that "sometimes science is wrong" is strange
That is perhaps the kernel of it. Science is never settled until the apple drops on your head and even then there will be those that argue it.
But definitely ruling mob rule in science is wrong. Because the predominant message can be infected by politics and finance
Well until Pythagoras figured out the earth was round everyone around him believed it to be flat. It took another thousand years to figure out the earth revolved around the sun.
I think in both cases they fought with the established science community to prove the axioms.
In this case all it will take is big pharma money to run out. Then the medical community will suddenly grow a conscience as opposed to finance based science.
I agree that as of August 2021 (prior to the full roll out of the vaccines) 83% of all deaths occurred in LTC. There are plenty of news articles that discussed the cover story regarding lack of autopsy resources to process the deaths and a general push for cremation which leads to a conclusion that no one wanted to know what had occured in LTC during the 2020-2021 period.
It seems from that we can say enough evidence of a crime led the military (who was called in to help at understaffed locations) in Ontario and Quebec to declare that level of care in LTC was inadequate and lead in some cases to deaths. Those deaths were still considered COVID deaths.
Yes there is a theory that the methods used to validate the virus itself were flawed.
Using VERO cells as a basis of isolation is contentious. Without VERO (monkey kidney) cells there has never been an independent isolation to examine so the cell theory exists as a point but the DNA sequence in the captured shed cells indicated that Moderns patented the sequence in 2015 and benefitted from the release of the virus monitarily.
So in the 'accidental' release from the Wuhan lab there is motive for the 'crime' to occur if as so stated there are enough cooincidences that form a conspiracy to commit.
I don't say i agree with all the points but as time passes we get closer to a truth rather than all the noise.
You attempt to prosthelytize using conflation.
It doesn't matter how long you take as the government has a balanced responsibility to protect not just the sick but the well.
Without verification you risk much more than 2 million worldwide number of which about 80% were elderly and may have died in any case. It is well noted that COVID affected primarily the elderly in the stages when vaccines were being introduced?
So out of 7 billion you sacrifice the lives of about 1400000 (at the low end: https://www.publichealthontario.ca/-/media/documents/ncov/epi/covid-19-aefi-report.pdf) otherwise healthy people of all ages who can develop myocarditis and eventually die or have heart troubles for the rest of their lives?
Sounds like you are robbing from the the poor on this line of thinking.
Btw why do you reference so many foreign sources? Can you use specifically Canadian sources so i can relate to your thoughts. I replied to you foreign numbers with same sources but I'd like to have Canadian only data on a Canadian site. It keeps the discussion relavent to the audience.
Trust but verify. If your government failed to independently verify the quality and efficacy of a vaccine then they failed to protect the national security of the nation and put it's people at risk of being test subjects in a grand experiment.
The cure can't be worse than the disease. If you never tested it anything is worse than the disease.
If you outsourced your national security to another country "trusting" that they do the right thing you failed to protect your people.
Trust but verify is an axiom not an option.
More like "these ants are nusenses"