See? Once again - and she does this with most of the few things she presents to support her half-baked bullshit - the article she quotes does not say what she claims it does.
I’m just here to downvote Tuchodi’s smug ignorance. Tuchodi claims this is a recent study. Once again; false.
The data and the study is from 2002. When you don’t understand content you search on google, just admit it’s above your grasp and stop spreading misinformation Tuchodi.
The data is from decades ago, and The Guardian is recycling an old study, 1 year after a mass vaccination campaign that causes heart damage in the same age group as this study. How convenient of The Guardian to manipulate their uninformed readers.
The hypothesis of this study is that air pollution causes PVCs and PAC’s in kids (way above Tuchodi’s comprehension level) . Premature atrial contractions (PACs) and isolated premature ventricular contractions do not cause sudden death. Energy drinks and other stimulants cause isolated premature ventricular contractions, cardiologists call it a benign arrhythmia. Yet this is what the study counted.
Also inconsistent in the study’s findings is the fact that:
sudden death is most common in the mornings or during sleep, when air pollution levels are at the lowest.
sudden death is caused by ventricle fibrillation or ventricular tachycardia, two arrhythmias this study does not count.
this study only monitored two types of arrhythmia’s, none are deadly.
“700 children ages 6 to 12 yo, who were in 3 school districts in the Harrisburg metropolitan area were recruited for the baseline examination from 2002 to 2006. and followed up again I’m 2013.”
Tuchodi claims this is a recent study. Once again; false.
I gave a quote from the study, which was published 14 Sept 2022.
The data and the study is from 2002
That is far from the whole story, as anyone who reads the study will see. You do know what a baseline is, I assume. Why would you pretend that was all there was to the study?
As for the rest, that's you beating your own drum and beside the point, which is that V&C1 said:
Frail, elderly, 50-80 year olds with heart and lung exposure to air pollution 3x and 4x longer are not at all affected
and that's just V&C1 layering on her own bullshit, given that the study involved about 300 teenagers.
This is a good example of how unreliable V&C1's posts are folks. She claims:
But when you read the article she's quoting it tells you they only looked at teenagers: Sept. 14 2022 "Doctors monitored heart activity and the air breathed by more than 300 healthy US teenagers over 24-hour periods." There's nothing said about the elderly. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/sep/14/healthy-teenagers-risk-irregular-heartbeats-air-pollution-study
See? Once again - and she does this with most of the few things she presents to support her half-baked bullshit - the article she quotes does not say what she claims it does.
She just makes shit up.
I’m just here to downvote Tuchodi’s smug ignorance. Tuchodi claims this is a recent study. Once again; false.
The data and the study is from 2002. When you don’t understand content you search on google, just admit it’s above your grasp and stop spreading misinformation Tuchodi.
The data is from decades ago, and The Guardian is recycling an old study, 1 year after a mass vaccination campaign that causes heart damage in the same age group as this study. How convenient of The Guardian to manipulate their uninformed readers.
The hypothesis of this study is that air pollution causes PVCs and PAC’s in kids (way above Tuchodi’s comprehension level) . Premature atrial contractions (PACs) and isolated premature ventricular contractions do not cause sudden death. Energy drinks and other stimulants cause isolated premature ventricular contractions, cardiologists call it a benign arrhythmia. Yet this is what the study counted.
Also inconsistent in the study’s findings is the fact that:
sudden death is most common in the mornings or during sleep, when air pollution levels are at the lowest.
sudden death is caused by ventricle fibrillation or ventricular tachycardia, two arrhythmias this study does not count.
this study only monitored two types of arrhythmia’s, none are deadly.
“700 children ages 6 to 12 yo, who were in 3 school districts in the Harrisburg metropolitan area were recruited for the baseline examination from 2002 to 2006. and followed up again I’m 2013.”
I gave a quote from the study, which was published 14 Sept 2022.
That is far from the whole story, as anyone who reads the study will see. You do know what a baseline is, I assume. Why would you pretend that was all there was to the study?
As for the rest, that's you beating your own drum and beside the point, which is that V&C1 said:
and that's just V&C1 layering on her own bullshit, given that the study involved about 300 teenagers.