Everything you wrote here is gibberish, especially this line:
academics attempting to keep their speaking fees
Anybody that does any study has an inherent bias. We all do. Scientists and researchers do their work for pay and/or recognition. That’s the whole point of scientific studies being peer reviewed, to isolate out the biases.
Take, for example, your pharma-funded modeling study that you posted or your conservative-voting states have higher excess deaths study. These are so blatantly biased that nobody will even bother to peer-review.
Only if you didn't follow OP's links and actually read them. I particularly liked this part of one of them: 29 August 2022 "Conclusion: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we found that the risk of myocarditis is more than seven fold higher in persons who were infected with the SARS-CoV-2 than in those who received the vaccine. These findings support the continued use of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines among all eligible persons per CDC and WHO recommendations." https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2022.951314/full
academics
You left out "discredited". They can't work in their profession, but they can make money by pandering to the people who are insulated - either by their fear or their "friends" - from the reality of a global pandemic.
conservative-voting states have higher excess deaths
This sharp contrast in the excess death rate gap before and after vaccines were available suggests that vaccine take-up likely played an important role.
Correlation, dummy.
They "suggest" that it was the vaccine.
They did not isolate vaccines as the cause.
Guess what else happened right around the same time - Democratic states locked down harder than Republican states. Democratic voters wore masks. Democratic voters didn't visit friends or family. Democratic voters locked themselves in their basements because the news told them to.
Again, major political bias. Their intention was to find a way to show that conservative voters were more likely to die. When your intention is set out from the beginning, you can find stats to confirm your bias.
You're a retard, ya?
You know what else... People have less car accidents when they lock themselves in their basements. Lockdowns led to less people dying from car accidents.
Everything you wrote here is gibberish, especially this line:
Anybody that does any study has an inherent bias. We all do. Scientists and researchers do their work for pay and/or recognition. That’s the whole point of scientific studies being peer reviewed, to isolate out the biases.
Take, for example, your pharma-funded modeling study that you posted or your conservative-voting states have higher excess deaths study. These are so blatantly biased that nobody will even bother to peer-review.
Only if you didn't follow OP's links and actually read them. I particularly liked this part of one of them: 29 August 2022 "Conclusion: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we found that the risk of myocarditis is more than seven fold higher in persons who were infected with the SARS-CoV-2 than in those who received the vaccine. These findings support the continued use of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines among all eligible persons per CDC and WHO recommendations." https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2022.951314/full
You left out "discredited". They can't work in their profession, but they can make money by pandering to the people who are insulated - either by their fear or their "friends" - from the reality of a global pandemic.
"What did he die of?"
"What was he registered as?"
Where's the bias?
This might be the stupidest thing i ever read. You a retard?
https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w30512/w30512.pdf
Correlation, dummy.
They "suggest" that it was the vaccine.
They did not isolate vaccines as the cause.
Guess what else happened right around the same time - Democratic states locked down harder than Republican states. Democratic voters wore masks. Democratic voters didn't visit friends or family. Democratic voters locked themselves in their basements because the news told them to.
Again, major political bias. Their intention was to find a way to show that conservative voters were more likely to die. When your intention is set out from the beginning, you can find stats to confirm your bias.
You're a retard, ya?
You know what else... People have less car accidents when they lock themselves in their basements. Lockdowns led to less people dying from car accidents.