Rigorous international study of N95 masks upends federal COVID narrative
(justthenews.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (36)
sorted by:
but the study you posted wasn't the current strain, so it too is therefor unable to be used as a analog for other similar viruses.
also only the first paragraph was about the study I posted, the other two were about the original study of discussion.
Clutching at straws,folks. One study was about covid, the other was not.
Unfortunately they have nothing to back up the rest. It's like they think they can out-science the scientists without doing any science.
Folks, cherry-picking a line out of the study doesn't change its conclusion.
nope, sorry, wasn't the current strain so the study doesn't count. I wouldn't want to gain valuable information for suitable analogs.
i find the '69% risk increase' part of the sentence far more interesting. And what was the study's conclusion exactly?
Folks, they were perfectly willing to accept a study that wasn't even about covid.
It's not surprising they would completely ignore the study's conclusion.
what was the study's conclusion?