Does that canada.ca web page use the same criteria to count their events as the Pfizer paper? And what does it mean that the Pfizer paper says "180 medically confirmed and 95 non-medically confirmed"? Should you be using 180 instead of 275 when you compare the results to Canada's?
And keep in mind that "Ischaemic stroke can follow COVID-19 vaccination but is much more common with COVID-19 infection itself" https://jnnp.bmj.com/content/92/11/1142
I'm busy with Christmas / New Years stuff but I hope to find more info about this.
yes, my decimal point was wrong. 0.65% of the participants had a stroke in the first 41 days after vaccination.
All the rest of the calculations were correct.
Ischaemic stroke can follow COVID-19 vaccination but is much more common with COVID-19 infection itself
And? This report was about people getting a stroke in the days following a specific event (vaccination). Pfizer's covid vaccine causes stroke.
Does that canada.ca web page use the same criteria to count their events as the Pfizer paper?
This is weak. You're struggling to make excuses for Pfizer. No, no comparison will ever be perfect. You're implying that a normal rate for Canadians with stroke would be 2.2 million per year if we used Pfizer's definitions of stroke. I'd bet, though, that Pfizer's definition of a stroke is more precise than Canada's official definition since it's in their best interest for it to be so.
In actuality, the incidence rate of stroke following the Pfizervaccine is higher than reported here since this report was only looking at the first 90 days following the vaccine. People also get their Pfizer stroke more than 90 days following the vaccine. As bad as it is in the report, Pfizer's vaccine causes more strokes than Pfizer wants to admit.
I'm happy to point out when your extremist misinformation is wrong.
You're implying that this is likely normal. Extremists makes excuses to support their misinformation.
This is not a normal rate.
275 people, out of 42,086 participants, had a stroke within the first 41 days of receiving the vaccine. That's .0065%
If this were a normal rate, more than 2.2 million people in Canada would experience a stroke EVERY YEAR.
Canada's population is 38,250,000. At .0065%, 248,625 people in Canada would have a stroke every 41 days, so 2,213,369 every year.
Only 875,500 current Canadians have ever had a stroke.. That's a far cry from over 2.2 million Canadians having a stroke every single year.
Keep posting extremist misinformation and I will tell you when you're wrong.
No. I'm asking what the normal rate is.
Your math seems shaky.
No. 1% of 42,086 would be 421 people. 275 people would be 0.65%
True. Do you think Pfizer had newborns in its trials? Using the total population of Canada is wrong.
According to your link that data is from 2017-2018. https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/services/publications/diseases-conditions/stroke-in-canada.html
Does that canada.ca web page use the same criteria to count their events as the Pfizer paper? And what does it mean that the Pfizer paper says "180 medically confirmed and 95 non-medically confirmed"? Should you be using 180 instead of 275 when you compare the results to Canada's?
And keep in mind that "Ischaemic stroke can follow COVID-19 vaccination but is much more common with COVID-19 infection itself" https://jnnp.bmj.com/content/92/11/1142
I'm busy with Christmas / New Years stuff but I hope to find more info about this.
yes, my decimal point was wrong. 0.65% of the participants had a stroke in the first 41 days after vaccination.
All the rest of the calculations were correct.
And? This report was about people getting a stroke in the days following a specific event (vaccination). Pfizer's covid vaccine causes stroke.
This is weak. You're struggling to make excuses for Pfizer. No, no comparison will ever be perfect. You're implying that a normal rate for Canadians with stroke would be 2.2 million per year if we used Pfizer's definitions of stroke. I'd bet, though, that Pfizer's definition of a stroke is more precise than Canada's official definition since it's in their best interest for it to be so.
In actuality, the incidence rate of stroke following the Pfizervaccine is higher than reported here since this report was only looking at the first 90 days following the vaccine. People also get their Pfizer stroke more than 90 days following the vaccine. As bad as it is in the report, Pfizer's vaccine causes more strokes than Pfizer wants to admit.
I'm happy to point out when your extremist misinformation is wrong.
Huh. I just realized you are - and I was - misinterpreting the Pfizer analysis.
You should have started by dividing 275 by 30 million, not 42,086.
Now that I've read the introduction I realize that 42,086 was the number of adverse events reported, not the number of subjects in a trial.
About 30 million doses of Pfizer's vaccine were used between its first authorization - the temporary one - on 01 December 2020 and the end of the analysis period on 28 February 2021. https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/covid-vaccine-doses-by-manufacturer
In that time 42,086 adverse events were reported through a variety of protocols - see section 2. Methodology on page 5.
So the percentage of reported stroke victims is (275/30,000,000)*100. Something like 0.0001%.
And that's without knowing if any of the strokes were even caused by the vaccine.
You're correct. I was referencing your original quote:
I guess I shouldn't just take your word for it.
⚰️You’re old and fat. Get your sudden death government juice Boomer ⚰️🪦
.
😘