More fantasizing folks. Or maybe she's thinking of some other thread and is simply confused. It's still one percent of the people who test positive for covid are dead.
Wrong again. You claimed that covid had a 1% death rate. Yes, this was another thread. Like i said, this was your claim as recently as a few weeks ago and not today in this thread.
After I corrected you, you shifted to saying 1% of people who test positive for covid are dead.
This is still wrong. 1% of people that HAD an OFFICIAL covid test died.
Do you know the difference? I was nice enough to explain it to you before. Probably best to research it yourself now.
Wrong again. You claimed that covid had a 1% death rate. Yes, this was another thread. Like i said, this was your claim as recently as a few weeks ago and not today in this thread.
After I corrected you, you shifted to saying 1% of people who test positive for covid are dead.
This is still wrong. 1% of people that HAD an OFFICIAL covid test died.
Do you know the difference? I was nice enough to explain it to you before. Probably best to research it yourself now.
The numbers are quite public folks:
Johns Hopkins University of Medicine: Global Confirmed - 665,991,560, Global Deaths - 6,717,787 https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/
Canada alone: Cases - 4,508,275, Deaths - 49,566 https://health-infobase.canada.ca/covid-19/
ScoobyDoo wants to argue semantics, but it doesn't change the numbers: one percent of the people who tested positive for covid are dead.
You changed the way you phrase because i told you that you were wrong. Good job.
Now i hope you understand that a random person getting an official covid test doesn’t mean he has a 1% chance of dying.
Is the test result positive? If so, historically one person in a hundred who gets a positive result dies.
You’re still implying that if a random person gets an official positive covid test, he has a 1% chance of dying.
Right? Is this what you’re trying to say without specifically saying it?