Speaking of understanding folks, what part of this do you think she's having trouble with: "This article is a preprint and has not been peer-reviewed [what does this mean?]. It reports new medical research that has yet to be evaluated and so should not be used to guide clinical practice." https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.12.17.22283625v1.full#T2
Folks perhaps the problem is that she's unaware of the importance of the peer review process. Predatory academic publishing is a thing now (https://libguides.usask.ca/predatorypublishers).As a result peer review is more important than ever. It hasn't been that long since I became aware of it myself.
It says, in part: "Peer review has been in existence as a means of assessing the content before publication for more than 300 years. Possibly, it goes to the credit of the Royal Society that introduced peer review in Philosophical Transactions in 1752."
Speaking of understanding folks, what part of this do you think she's having trouble with: "This article is a preprint and has not been peer-reviewed [what does this mean?]. It reports new medical research that has yet to be evaluated and so should not be used to guide clinical practice." https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.12.17.22283625v1.full#T2
Thank you for confirming you are stupid to understand a clinic study!
Warning
The fat boomer endorses research that is not reproducible.
The fat boomer relies on POLITICO fact checkers for medical advice.
The fat boomer wants research to have preconceived conclusions funded by Pharma.
https://www.pacificresearch.org/the-corruption-of-peer-review-is-harming-scientific-credibility/ https://drugmonkey.scientopia.org/2020/04/13/corruption-of-nih-peer-review/ https://www.sciencealert.com/how-much-top-journal-editors-get-paid-by-big-pharma-corrupt https://www.brightworkresearch.com/the-often-hidden-problems-with-peer-review-research/ https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/05/upshot/peer-review-the-worst-way-to-judge-research-except-for-all-the-others.html
Folks perhaps the problem is that she's unaware of the importance of the peer review process. Predatory academic publishing is a thing now (https://libguides.usask.ca/predatorypublishers).As a result peer review is more important than ever. It hasn't been that long since I became aware of it myself.
Here is a paper that would help her if she read it: http://eprints.rclis.org/39332/1/26964-465493240-1-PB.pdf
It says, in part: "Peer review has been in existence as a means of assessing the content before publication for more than 300 years. Possibly, it goes to the credit of the Royal Society that introduced peer review in Philosophical Transactions in 1752."
Your opinion as a Covid Super Spreader is noted.
Thank you.
You’re old and you’re fat.
Get Boosted Covid Nazi. Your survival rate for the common cold is very low. Better get all the boosters you can. Get your sudden death booster juice.