I understand this: "This article is a preprint and has not been peer-reviewed [what does this mean?]. It reports new medical research that has yet to be evaluated and so should not be used to guide clinical practice." [emphasis added] https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.12.17.22283625v1.full#T2
Step 1: Lie and Deny. Tuchodi claims the peer review is authoritative science*
Step 2: Admit and normalize. Tuchodi admits peer review process is corrupt and flawed (NYT article) and normalizes the corruption. ”Of course it’s flawed, totally normal to have studies that are not reproducible and it’s totally normal for Pharma to fund the studies with a preconceived outcome. Folks it’s normal, we simply need suggestions”
Communist tactics. Lie, deny, then admit and normalize.
Sad, the fat boomer is a science denier. The fat boomers loves the corrupt peer review racket.
I understand this: "This article is a preprint and has not been peer-reviewed [what does this mean?]. It reports new medical research that has yet to be evaluated and so should not be used to guide clinical practice." [emphasis added] https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.12.17.22283625v1.full#T2
The fat boomer endorses peer reviewed studies that are not reproducible. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/05/upshot/peer-review-the-worst-way-to-judge-research-except-for-all-the-others.html
The fat boomer posts POLITICO fact checks and pretends it is medical advice. (Then lies and denies it) https://www.brightworkresearch.com/the-often-hidden-problems-with-peer-review-research/
The fat boomer likes peer reviewed corrupt research that has preconceived conclusions funded by Pharma. https://www.sciencealert.com/how-much-top-journal-editors-get-paid-by-big-pharma-corrupt
https://drugmonkey.scientopia.org/2020/04/13/corruption-of-nih-peer-review/
https://www.pacificresearch.org/the-corruption-of-peer-review-is-harming-scientific-credibility/
She has no suggestions for improving the peer review process folks, and her own link says it's the best process we have. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/05/upshot/peer-review-the-worst-way-to-judge-research-except-for-all-the-others.html
And apparently she approves of the MSM that she agrees with.
Step 1: Lie and Deny. Tuchodi claims the peer review is authoritative science*
Step 2: Admit and normalize. Tuchodi admits peer review process is corrupt and flawed (NYT article) and normalizes the corruption. ”Of course it’s flawed, totally normal to have studies that are not reproducible and it’s totally normal for Pharma to fund the studies with a preconceived outcome. Folks it’s normal, we simply need suggestions”
Communist tactics. Lie, deny, then admit and normalize.
Sad, the fat boomer is a science denier. The fat boomers loves the corrupt peer review racket.
The fat boomer endorses peer reviewed studies that are not reproducible. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/05/upshot/peer-review-the-worst-way-to-judge-research-except-for-all-the-others.html
The fat boomer posts POLITICO fact checks and pretends it is medical advice. (Then lies and denies it) https://www.brightworkresearch.com/the-often-hidden-problems-with-peer-review-research/
The fat boomer likes peer reviewed corrupt research that has preconceived conclusions funded by Pharma. https://www.sciencealert.com/how-much-top-journal-editors-get-paid-by-big-pharma-corrupt
https://drugmonkey.scientopia.org/2020/04/13/corruption-of-nih-peer-review/
More proof she doesn't read her own links folks. Especially the one that says peer review is the best process we have: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/05/upshot/peer-review-the-worst-way-to-judge-research-except-for-all-the-others.html
You'll notice she doesn't have an alternate suggestion. If she was in charge anybody could publish anything and call it science.
And apparently she approves of the MSM that she agrees with.