AUTHORITATIVE?? Like your Facebook fact checkers Fat Boomer?
No thanks, I prefer reliable, reproducible and unbiased research. Your communist authoritarian streak sure got exposed eh. So to recap:
The fat boomer endorses research that is not reproducible.
The fat boomer relies on POLITICO fact checkers for medical advice.
The fat boomer wants research to have preconceived conclusions funded by Pharma.
The fat Boomer failed again. No wonder everyone mocks you and laughs at you. Get boosted! Get as many boosters as possible so we can keep laughing at you.
AUTHORITATIVE?? Like your Facebook fact checkers Fat Boomer?
No thanks, I prefer reliable, reproducible and unbiased research. Your communist authoritarian streak sure got exposed eh. So to recap:
The fat boomer endorses research that is not reproducible. The fat boomer relies on POLITICO fact checkers for medical advice.
The fat boomer wants research to have preconceived conclusions funded by Pharma.
The fat Boomer failed again. No wonder everyone mocks you and laughs at you. Get boosted! Get as many boosters as possible so we can keep laughing at you.
https://www.pacificresearch.org/the-corruption-of-peer-review-is-harming-scientific-credibility/
https://drugmonkey.scientopia.org/2020/04/13/corruption-of-nih-peer-review/
https://www.sciencealert.com/how-much-top-journal-editors-get-paid-by-big-pharma-corrupt
https://www.brightworkresearch.com/the-often-hidden-problems-with-peer-review-research/
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/05/upshot/peer-review-the-worst-way-to-judge-research-except-for-all-the-others.html
V&C1 doesn't want to talk about the paper under discussion (https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.12.17.22283625v1.full#T2)
A paper which clearly states it "should not be used to guide medical practice". Follow the link and read it yourself.
She wants to talk about Facebook instead, for some reason.