Virtually every study you find online is published before any peer-review happens. This includes virtually every study that you, yourself, posted. This is normal. So, ya, it’s stupid when your criticism of a study that you don’t like the results of is that it’s not peer-reviewed.
That’s not the stupidest part, though. An actual intelligent response to s study that you don’t agree with is to criticize, perhaps, methods or biases among other things. When your criticism is that it’s not peer-reviewed and, so, implying that the study is worthless because of that, it’s a sign of your lack of intelligence. Stupid.
Stupid question. Majority of scientific studies get published first, followed by peer review.
It's a pretty straightforward question folks, and quite relevant since the paper in question has not been peer reviewed.
It's a shame ScoobyDoo has to duck and weave.
Straight forward stupid question.
Certainly a stupid answer.
It’s not. I enjoy pointing out your stupidity.
Virtually every study you find online is published before any peer-review happens. This includes virtually every study that you, yourself, posted. This is normal. So, ya, it’s stupid when your criticism of a study that you don’t like the results of is that it’s not peer-reviewed.
That’s not the stupidest part, though. An actual intelligent response to s study that you don’t agree with is to criticize, perhaps, methods or biases among other things. When your criticism is that it’s not peer-reviewed and, so, implying that the study is worthless because of that, it’s a sign of your lack of intelligence. Stupid.