I won’t criticize the bullshit studies that you post for not being peer-reviewed because i’m not a retard. I’ll criticize the actual bullshit in the bad studies.
The Cleveland study he quotes says quite clearly "This article is a preprint and has not been peer-reviewed [what does this mean?]. It reports new medical research that has yet to be evaluated and so should not be used to guide clinical practice." https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.12.17.22283625v1.full#T2
Yet there he is using it to provide medical advice..
In your dreams.
https://libanswers.unm.edu/faq/162384
https://guides.library.oregonstate.edu/c.php?g=285842&p=1906145
Pointing out that a study warns against immediately using its findings is not a criticism. It's a quote.
your links here confirm everything that i just told you.
Except for the bullshit parts, like:
I won’t criticize the bullshit studies that you post for not being peer-reviewed because i’m not a retard. I’ll criticize the actual bullshit in the bad studies.
Here's my first comment:
https://www.cpsbc.ca/news/hearing-notification-re-dr-charles-douglas-hoffe
The Cleveland study he quotes says quite clearly "This article is a preprint and has not been peer-reviewed [what does this mean?]. It reports new medical research that has yet to be evaluated and so should not be used to guide clinical practice." https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.12.17.22283625v1.full#T2
Yet there he is using it to provide medical advice..
Where am I criticizing the study?