What does the paper Jones is basing his article on say?
"Several cases of myocarditis following anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination have been published ... Most of the reported cases showed clinically mild courses with resolution of symptoms without treatment. However, in rare instances individuals required intensive care support or even died from acute heart failure ... Our study is limited by the relatively small cohort size and inherits the bias of an endpoint analysis. The nature of our autopsy study necessitates that the data are descriptive in quality and does not allow any epidemiological conclusions in terms of incidence or risk estimation. The reported incidence of (epi-)myocarditis after vaccination is low and the risks of hospitalization and death associated with COVID-19 are stated to be greater than the recorded risk associated with COVID-19 vaccination" https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00392-022-02129-5#Sec4
When they say "The reported incidence of (epi-)myocarditis after vaccination is low and the risks of hospitalization and death associated with COVID-19 are stated to be greater than the recorded risk associated with COVID-19 vaccination" they back it up with another paper: "Despite these rare cases of self-limited myocarditis, the benefit–risk assessment for COVID-19 (mRNA) vaccination underscores a very strong favourable balance for all age and sex groups. Vaccines against COVID-19 have proved to be highly effective at preventing symptomatic disease in clinical trials and real-world reports. Vaccination flattens the epidemiology curve and strongly reduces the risk of COVID-19-related hospitalization, intensive care admission and death in both young and elderly individuals10. COVID-19 vaccination also reduces the risk of COVID-19-associated acute kidney injury, arrhythmia and thrombosis10. Moreover, with COVID-19 vaccination, the risk of myocardial injury and myocarditis decreases 1,000-fold in the general population, with a minor 1–5-fold increased risk of mild myocarditis in young adults. Therefore, COVID-19 vaccination has an extremely favourable risk ratio for myocarditis and should be recommended in adolescent and adult populations." https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8656440/
Get your medical advice from experts folks, not anonymous knuckleheads on social media.
More hair-on-fire reporting from The Knucklehead Cell of the Army of Ignorance folks.
Just for starters, look at the link text ("three people") and then the post title ("10 million deaths")
TLDR: There's a global pandemic going on. People die. The risk from vaccines is very low compared to the risk from the virus.
That said, what are the medical qualifications of Will Jones, the journalist who wrote the Brownstone article?
None. See https://dailysceptic.org/about/
What does the paper Jones is basing his article on say?
"Several cases of myocarditis following anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination have been published ... Most of the reported cases showed clinically mild courses with resolution of symptoms without treatment. However, in rare instances individuals required intensive care support or even died from acute heart failure ... Our study is limited by the relatively small cohort size and inherits the bias of an endpoint analysis. The nature of our autopsy study necessitates that the data are descriptive in quality and does not allow any epidemiological conclusions in terms of incidence or risk estimation. The reported incidence of (epi-)myocarditis after vaccination is low and the risks of hospitalization and death associated with COVID-19 are stated to be greater than the recorded risk associated with COVID-19 vaccination" https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00392-022-02129-5#Sec4
When they say "The reported incidence of (epi-)myocarditis after vaccination is low and the risks of hospitalization and death associated with COVID-19 are stated to be greater than the recorded risk associated with COVID-19 vaccination" they back it up with another paper: "Despite these rare cases of self-limited myocarditis, the benefit–risk assessment for COVID-19 (mRNA) vaccination underscores a very strong favourable balance for all age and sex groups. Vaccines against COVID-19 have proved to be highly effective at preventing symptomatic disease in clinical trials and real-world reports. Vaccination flattens the epidemiology curve and strongly reduces the risk of COVID-19-related hospitalization, intensive care admission and death in both young and elderly individuals10. COVID-19 vaccination also reduces the risk of COVID-19-associated acute kidney injury, arrhythmia and thrombosis10. Moreover, with COVID-19 vaccination, the risk of myocardial injury and myocarditis decreases 1,000-fold in the general population, with a minor 1–5-fold increased risk of mild myocarditis in young adults. Therefore, COVID-19 vaccination has an extremely favourable risk ratio for myocarditis and should be recommended in adolescent and adult populations." https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8656440/
Get your medical advice from experts folks, not anonymous knuckleheads on social media.
Notice how you had no actual information in that reply?