14 Politically inconvenient facts that were clear as daylight in 2020 are finally being acknowledged by far right Washington Post (media.omegacanada.win) posted 1 year ago by UraIIfucked 1 year ago by UraIIfucked +15 / -1 35 comments download share 35 comments share download save hide report block hide replies
ScoobyDoo: "This statement states that they’re not being exaggerated for nefarious reasons and not that they’re not being exaggerated." https://omegacanada.win/p/16a9zhpQfe/politically-inconvenient-facts-t/
Me: So if they're "not being exaggerated for nefarious reasons" what might the non-nefarious reasons be?
ScoobyDoo: deflect
Me: So if they're "not being exaggerated for nefarious reasons" what might the non-nefarious reasons be?
ScoobyDoo: deflect
Me: So if they're "not being exaggerated for nefarious reasons" what might the non-nefarious reasons be?
ScoobyDoo: deflect
Me: So if they're "not being exaggerated for nefarious reasons" what might the non-nefarious reasons be?
ScoobyDoo: deflect
Me: So if they're "not being exaggerated for nefarious reasons" what might the non-nefarious reasons be?
ScoobyDoo: deflect
etc.
Can’t stand it that I corrected you on basic English, eh?
Notice the lack of an an answer to a simple question folks?
I'll ask it again:
ScoobyDoo says: "This statement states that they’re not being exaggerated for nefarious reasons and not that they’re not being exaggerated." https://omegacanada.win/p/16a9zhpQfe/politically-inconvenient-facts-t/
The question: if they're "not being exaggerated for nefarious reasons" what might the non-nefarious reasons be?
You still can’t take it that you lack comprehension of basic English?
ScoobyDoo says: "This statement states that they’re not being exaggerated for nefarious reasons and not that they’re not being exaggerated." https://omegacanada.win/p/16a9zhpQfe/politically-inconvenient-facts-t/
If they're "not being exaggerated for nefarious reasons" what might the non-nefarious reasons be?