CBDC IS COMING! TD BANK TO TRIAL RUN DIGITAL BANKING IN CANADA
(www.bitchute.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (28)
sorted by:
I've answered that question on 900 years at this point you need to disprove what i said or accept it. It's my belief. I read of it so it's true to me.
You apologise for the German governments medical policies during the second world war period and are trying to distance their complicity in those policies by pretending that "those policies were from the Nazis" like it was done in isolation and not implemented nationwide. Is your position that it was okay to protect those medical professionals that blindly followed orders during that time as not culpable in some way? Did they not posses free will? Do you like the policies? You never answered my question; were the policies to force medical procedures, tattoo identies on the arms and base the ability to function in society on a health pass not evil?
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1297275/
What is it called when you discriminated against the religious beliefs of a person or group by using slurs to discredit their beliefs as you "set the goalpost" in the beginning? It's obvious you feel it's okay to discriminate against Christians and subtly against Jews. When you do a google search of "goat herder" do you know what comes up? Sure you do. One of the associated slurs is "goat [expletive]". It's common that when using "goat herder" it is to imply the second term.
https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Goat%20Herder
Jews were well known in the time of the Bible to be strongly "goat herders" and proudly such. But few goat herders were educated enough to be scholars or academics who would have been able to capture the words in any great form and more importantly protect those words from destruction. By using slurs to try to diminish the value of the work or to discredit the people who follow the text you show your true beliefs. There is no proof that John was a goat herder. But he could read and write which at the time no goat herder could do.
https://evidenceforchristianity.org/were-people-literate-in-the-time-of-jesus-r/
If literacy at the time of Jesus was around 3% then those like John that could write letters and collect thoughts were highly treasured assets and would have been protected. No "goat herder".
So by using those terms what was your intention? Is it directed hate toward adherents to the Christian faith that drives you or some other reason you posted this misinformation?
You obviously just repeated hate you heard before like it was true.
What is the intention of Revelation? Here's some detail:
The theme of Revelation is the revelation of the person and the prophetic program of Jesus Christ. Many purposes can be detected in the book.
First, it was written to encourage believers to endure persecution and to persevere through suffering, knowing that the victory of Christ over the world and the Devil is guaranteed and certain.
Second, the book was written to show how all of prophecy focuses on Jesus Christ, His person and His program for the world.
Third, the book seeks to unite all the various lines of biblical prophecy (both Old and New Testaments), and to show how they converge upon the second coming of Christ to rule the earth in His messianic kingdom.
Fourth, the book seeks to correct some moral and doctrinal problems that existed (and still exist), in the churches, and to instruct Christians in such things as salvation, prophecy, the person of Christ, and Christian living.
And finally, the book may be an attack of the paganism and emperor worship of the Roman Empire, particularly against the emperor Domitian and his persecution of Christians. (There are many possible veiled references to the anti-Christian nature and activities of Rome in the book).
So to your question:
You offer no proof that the "claim has been wrong before". On what basis? The Bible can be considered witness and warning to future generations and as such is the most treasured tome in history.
Literal interpretation of the Bible is wrong and hateful. Everyone who cherry picks a line or discredit the authors of the Bible with bad intentions are spreading misinformation and potentially inciting hate. It's a form of Christian persecution.
You are still conflating "Germans" and "Nazis". If you believe they are one and the same then I'm interested in what you're doing about your guilt over the way First Nations continue to be treated here.
But you conflate "Germans" and "Nazis" without apparent remorse.
Give me some similar predictions about what will be going on in the world in 3900 AD. How accurate do you think they will be?
It's common knowledge. "Over the past 2,000 years, Revelation has inspired great paintings, songs and literature, has been used to justify wars, and has led many Christian groups to believe the end of the world is imminent." https://www.npr.org/transcripts/148125942. The Fifth Monarchists, for example.
Are you truly unaware of this?
Settle down. It's a discussion, not a pogrom. Freedom of religion means belonging to whatever faith you choose to. If you think that means persecuting every other faith then that says something about you.
Germans voted in the National Socialists in a majority. That means that those that voted for them were in agreement with their policies.
I don't use "Nazi" as a term just like i don't use "Goat Herder" - they are both slurs.
The Germans own their support of their government policies.
Trying to say these policy supporters didn't include people who went on after the government changed is a lie. The people who were complicit simply crawled back into the woodwork of life and for the next 70 years were hunted down. It's not possible to catch them all but it was tried. Some hid in plain sight because they were powerful or valuable.
So once again i feel like you are trying to apologize for the ones who hid. Do you feel some camraderie in some way with their behaviour? Why?
And yet based on the same mentality how many churches were burned two years ago and now a school where 3 children died is fresh in the news; neither being declared a terrorist hate crime so it appears it is A-OK to persecute Christians.
Is it a dangerous precedent to establish in the minds of people that Christians are fair game? Are you sure you wish to agree with it?
Is this why the culprits of the church fires were never brought to justice? Is it our leaders feel that Christians somehow deserve being persecuted?
I feel like you are trying to deminish the seriousness of harboring hate for a religious group.
You skipped the question about First Nations in Canada. Are you doing anything about the fact that - in terms of cultural loss and access to healthcare and education, and in terms of poverty levels and incarceration rates - they are still suffering the from the genocide, since you apparently think all citizens are personally responsible for their government's actions?
I feel you're mistaken in assuming "German" and "Nazi" are interchangeable.
Nazi is the conveniently abbreviated name of a political party: the Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei. Goat herder is an honourable occupation that has been around for thousands of years. If you consider them slurs that's on you.
"By one measure, the U.S. has had a shooting on school grounds almost every day". Each incident is as horrific as the next. The fact that you choose one of them and call it Christian persecution before anything is known about the shooter's motive shows how overly eager you are to jump to conclusions.
Based on that a person could make the mistake of jumping to the conclusion that you have a persecution complex.
At this point it is just as possible that abusers were the target. You should moderate your accusations until you know more.
You have gotten a lot of mileage out of a comment that pointed out how odd it is that some people think "I am coming soon" means "I am coming in 2,000 years". You would seem more reasonable if you didn't try to claim that comment invariably means things that were never said.
The shooter was a student more than ten years before. It's very likely no one they knew was at the school. The shooter has a manifesto.
So once again you are apologising for the perpetrator and blaming the victim.
You live in an intellectual fantasy world. There are three children who won't have lives to live.
Two wrongs don't make a right.
You tried to change the goal post again so unless you want to create a new thread to expand on your beliefs regarding the first Nations I'm not sure what it has to do with anything.