Our resident bozo (the anonymous joker pretending to be another anonymous person who is pretending to be a third anonymous person) thinks she is making the point that Bill Gates is manipulating the media.

If you follow her links you'll find that over the last 25 years the Gates foundation has contributed about $320 million to various media outlets. Now compare that to the parent company of Fox News, which has averaged almost $10 billion in revenue each year for the last 10 years.

Who do you think has more influence folks?

As for the WHO, the Gates Foundation supplies about 10% of the WHO budget, and its money is spent on polio.

Links:

https://www.inet.ox.ac.uk/news/our-world-in-data-new-funding

Peanuts ($1.8M) and old news (2017) folks.

https://www.euronews.com/next/2023/02/03/how-is-the-world-health-organization-funded-and-why-does-it-rely-so-much-on-bill-gates

"Polio eradication, for instance, has long been WHO’s best-funded program, mainly because much of the Gates Foundation’s contributions have been directed to that cause."

https://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/politics/does-bill-gates-have-too-much-influence-in-the-who-/46570526

"the Gates Foundation, ... [accounts] ... for some 10% of its budget. Only the US government pays more"

https://thegrayzone.com/2021/11/21/bill-gates-million-media-outlets-global-agenda/

Like I say, that's spread over 25 years.