Because scumbags on this website think so.
(media.omegacanada.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (9)
sorted by:
The thing is the left seems to want to argue that there hypothetically could exist some form of 'acceptable child murder'. Like thats the 'gotcha' of this. The contention isnt that rape is also bad- its that rape is a great excuse to kill an infant DONT YA THINK
The extremely rare exceptions were never in contention until the only allowable alternative was this, plus allowing for unlimited including post-birth (literally killing babies in the ward). So you force me into a position where I have to accept these terms because at least that child isnt one more victim of this encounter- can go for adoption say- and less children are dying OVERALL because of the other bs you people want to do.
And dont say adoption leads to trafficking unless you want me to tickle you because I know you dont actually care about that
So you believe that a rapist deserves their victim to be forced to have the baby? You still equate that to "child murdering" even though there's a marked difference between an actual child and unborn fetus?
And adoption is surely a thing, but it's so frickin overloaded I've never met a foster kid who absolutely loved their situation - and I've known one who was statutorily raped.
I think its pretty easy maybe the person carrying the bundle of cells and will be forced to birth and care for them should decide if they want safe and legal abortions that won't put them at risk.
It's just a fact that women will die if you limit abortion, so it might as well be an enshrined right.
Also "don't make me tickle you" is some top tier threatening