Scum

Can you say for certain that every single person could weather it if they have comorbidity?

Are you implying the lockdowns and jab mandates would have been more sensibly pushed on those with comorbidities only

The only guarantee is you lose all property and upward vertical social mobility. They're assuming that will also make you happy.

Every month more and more vagrants are helming highway offramp exits begging for change. Meanwhile the government just says "Canadians just dont want to work for some reason lol"

Ive never seen this version of Christ depicted in homes of the faithful or in churches. Im not a church going man by any stretch mind you - but the only times I have seen this, very feminine doe-eyed "soft" Christ has been in posts or media slandering Christianity

Ive much more frequently seen the 'classic' renderings, top left- left half etc

Please forgive the resident patron of the short bus. They unironically believe real socialism hasnt been tried -so you can see where it sources from

not contributing shit while complaining about anything at all to garner support from the fools that hold this country hostage with their dumbass habitual and braindead voting habits?

I literally couldnt have said it better myself

Like myself, certainly you saw this pivot coming too

In New Brunswick you were barred from buying groceries without it

Glossary:

Lady on twitter

Someone who just happened to post a publicly available video

talking head

Representative of the Japanese government -- apparently representing the minority means your positions and information parlayed suddenly isnt credible. Someone tell the LPC i guess. Or maybe it only counts when they have the dreaded wrong letter next to their name

unable to find

Didnt look outside cnn, msnbc and health.gov. has been ignoring years worth of content here

guessing

something thats apparently okay when he does it - where did you get your degree again? Arent you a car mechanic?

worldofmeters

Whataboutism - fear man says covid kill more therefor death from jab probably fine no more questions needed

folks

The verbal crutch of a fool

Preliminary folks-post:

No. The pdf thats linked in the article does not mention anywhere the statement: "YES WE ARE LYING THEN AND THEN NOW AM ALSO LYING" cosigned by every so called doctor whos ever appeared on CNN, CBC or has the name Bill Gates. Rest assured, they do a lot of weaseling, ass covering and accountability dodging. "its up to the provinces" "over 80 or immuno still recommended" "Pfizers bottom line still depends on that booster so mayyyyybe" all the garbage you come to expect by now.

I also feel I should mention that the person who wrote the article isnt quoting themselves but govt representatives therefor any questions of the medical qualifications of the author specifically can and should be regarded as silly distraction from the topic at hand- the statement is there plain as day and like I have said all along "The government has investigated itself and found its done nothing wrong"

Hey cut it out with your lucid takes its not on brand

And then there was the one Urallfucked

"Real communism has never been tried", that opinion sucks

He now has a clone

Whose usurping his throne

and his comical accuracy could win bucks

Its all an effort to convince someone who will go to their grave without admitting fault or doubt. A true faithful.

Some on the board still expect reason from those who long since abandoned it

Whats your justification for charging more taxes instead of channeling existing funds to other places. Say instead of buying hundreds of millions of doses no one will take or throwing it at Ukraine

cant wait to hear your answer folks

Faced the potential risk and live my life free of fear. What about you?

the intercept is a leftwing activism blog posing as a news source. another safe dismissal

You mean 'properly test new medicine instead of mass mandating it'?

My what an unreasonable demand

I cant tell the difference tbh

I hope your son lives a long happy life unaffected by whatever poisons you've insisted upon him. mental or otherwise

You seem to be conjoining peer review with truthfulness which any 4th graders afterschool special will tell you is not a good way to judge truth. Whats popular isnt always right whats right isnt always popular.

You even said one thing a non-PR study is is potentially useful, yet you dismiss because it doesnt have the outset approval of those who face no consequence for it being wrong or duplicitous. People who, its been mentioned many many times, have a vested interest in one particular course of action.

Dont forget to get your booster.

Almost Shakespearian

A lot of the policy was also based on 'computer modelling' which naturally defaulted to worst case scenarios every time it was brought up. Did they purposely not report better predictions? Very possible even if they were projected it wasnt reported

All fear no science. All "faith" no reason. Lockstep with marxism, as usual

Trudeau breaks promise/ supporters dont notice vote for correct letter anyway

1 out of X. maybe.

Im going to follow your lead and suggest since you posted CNN as one of your "sources" you actually have no idea at all what you're talking about and your other sources dont either and can be safely ignored.

Thanks for posting all of these examples. It will be useful to have these post as reference in spite of the dedicated regime defender