Ive never seen this version of Christ depicted in homes of the faithful or in churches. Im not a church going man by any stretch mind you - but the only times I have seen this, very feminine doe-eyed "soft" Christ has been in posts or media slandering Christianity
Ive much more frequently seen the 'classic' renderings, top left- left half etc
not contributing shit while complaining about anything at all to garner support from the fools that hold this country hostage with their dumbass habitual and braindead voting habits?
I literally couldnt have said it better myself
Lady on twitter
Someone who just happened to post a publicly available video
Representative of the Japanese government -- apparently representing the minority means your positions and information parlayed suddenly isnt credible. Someone tell the LPC i guess. Or maybe it only counts when they have the dreaded wrong letter next to their name
unable to find
Didnt look outside cnn, msnbc and health.gov. has been ignoring years worth of content here
something thats apparently okay when he does it - where did you get your degree again? Arent you a car mechanic?
Whataboutism - fear man says covid kill more therefor death from jab probably fine no more questions needed
The verbal crutch of a fool
No. The pdf thats linked in the article does not mention anywhere the statement: "YES WE ARE LYING THEN AND THEN NOW AM ALSO LYING" cosigned by every so called doctor whos ever appeared on CNN, CBC or has the name Bill Gates. Rest assured, they do a lot of weaseling, ass covering and accountability dodging. "its up to the provinces" "over 80 or immuno still recommended" "Pfizers bottom line still depends on that booster so mayyyyybe" all the garbage you come to expect by now.
I also feel I should mention that the person who wrote the article isnt quoting themselves but govt representatives therefor any questions of the medical qualifications of the author specifically can and should be regarded as silly distraction from the topic at hand- the statement is there plain as day and like I have said all along "The government has investigated itself and found its done nothing wrong"
Whats your justification for charging more taxes instead of channeling existing funds to other places. Say instead of buying hundreds of millions of doses no one will take or throwing it at Ukraine
cant wait to hear your answer folks
You seem to be conjoining peer review with truthfulness which any 4th graders afterschool special will tell you is not a good way to judge truth. Whats popular isnt always right whats right isnt always popular.
You even said one thing a non-PR study is is potentially useful, yet you dismiss because it doesnt have the outset approval of those who face no consequence for it being wrong or duplicitous. People who, its been mentioned many many times, have a vested interest in one particular course of action.
Dont forget to get your booster.
A lot of the policy was also based on 'computer modelling' which naturally defaulted to worst case scenarios every time it was brought up. Did they purposely not report better predictions? Very possible even if they were projected it wasnt reported
All fear no science. All "faith" no reason. Lockstep with marxism, as usual
1 out of X. maybe.
Im going to follow your lead and suggest since you posted CNN as one of your "sources" you actually have no idea at all what you're talking about and your other sources dont either and can be safely ignored.