Eg, you guys say "not enough research or shit when into it" while not specifying or even having in mind any standard that would be enough. If I bring up any thing you'll look for any single minor detail and then whinge about that instead of interacting with the hard data or considering that you might be in the wrong.
If you want to effectively debate you can't go in with your position already made up with no tolerance for new information or changing your stance.
And debating about covid requires things like you to know what mRNA is, how statistics actually work, and things that you're too busy getting taught responses to actually learn anything.
Are you gonna prove that it's unreliable or what?
You're confusing bad faith acting with debating.
Eg, you guys say "not enough research or shit when into it" while not specifying or even having in mind any standard that would be enough. If I bring up any thing you'll look for any single minor detail and then whinge about that instead of interacting with the hard data or considering that you might be in the wrong.
If you want to effectively debate you can't go in with your position already made up with no tolerance for new information or changing your stance.
And debating about covid requires things like you to know what mRNA is, how statistics actually work, and things that you're too busy getting taught responses to actually learn anything.