They say after the fact that it did releave symptoms, which is tenuous at best because it's based on opinions from studies in China, that bastion of reliability that produced studies that were later retracted:
TL:DR: u/Anither claims a study is about vaccines when it isn't, references a second study that was withdrawn by 3 of its 4 authors, and provides 1) nothing relevant to covid virus transmission or 2) proof that Hydroxychloroquine is approved for use in treating covid.
Because the shots were never tested to reduce transmission
But they reduced transmission. For example: "A study of covid-19 transmission within English households using data gathered in early 2021 found that even a single dose of a covid-19 vaccine reduced the likelihood of household transmission by 40-50%" The British Medical Journal
A surprising number of people seem to be unaware of this.
Study after study has shown that vaccination reduced the impact of the virus:
"COVID-19 vaccination both before and after having COVID-19 significantly decreased post–COVID-19 conditions for the circulating variants during the study period although vaccine effectiveness was low." https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9726631/
"Three and four doses of BNT162b2 or CoronaVac were effective against Omicron infection 7 days after vaccination (VE of 48% (95% credible interval 34–64%) and 69% (46–98%) for three and four doses of BNT162b2, respectively; VE of 30% (1–66%) and 56% (6–97%) for three and four doses of CoronaVac, respectively)." https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-023-02219-5
Because the shots were never tested to reduce transmission,
https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-pfizer-vaccine-transmission-idUSL1N31F20E
They say after the fact that it did releave symptoms, which is tenuous at best because it's based on opinions from studies in China, that bastion of reliability that produced studies that were later retracted:
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)32656-8/fulltext
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(23)00691-8/fulltext
What I find interesting is the lies spread about treatments like HCQ were retracted as well:
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736%2820%2931180-6/fulltext
So all those thousands of fake articles demonizing treatments were based off of lies spread by 'science'.
I wonder how many of the copy paste articles referenced are sourced from these studies in whole or in part?
https://www.foxnews.com/science/covid-19-papers-retracted-lancet-new-england-medical-journal
Looks like the company couldnt provide evidence to support their claims.
I wonder how many other studies are based on fraudulent data like these?
TL:DR: u/Anither claims a study is about vaccines when it isn't, references a second study that was withdrawn by 3 of its 4 authors, and provides 1) nothing relevant to covid virus transmission or 2) proof that Hydroxychloroquine is approved for use in treating covid.
But they reduced transmission. For example: "A study of covid-19 transmission within English households using data gathered in early 2021 found that even a single dose of a covid-19 vaccine reduced the likelihood of household transmission by 40-50%" The British Medical Journal
The first vaccine was approved long after that study was concluded. It had nothing to do with vaccines.
The paper was voluntarily withdrawn by three of the four authors themselves. Read all about it here: https://retractionwatch.com/2020/06/04/lancet-retracts-controversial-hydroxychloroquine-study/.
Hydroxychloroquine is still not approved for use in treating covid.
Because no vaccine is 100% effective.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/334400362_Compulsory_vaccinations_for_children_Balancing_the_competing_human_rights_at_stake
https://www.future-ed.org/the-outbreak-archipelago-when-school-choice-meets-vaccine-exemption/
https://www.healthline.com/health-news/this-is-what-happens-when-children-dont-get-vaccinated
https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/consumers-biologics/vaccines-children-guide-parents-and-caregivers
https://elm.umaryland.edu/elm-stories/Elm-Stories-Content/Vaccines-One-of-the-Greatest-Public-Health-Achievements.php
A surprising number of people seem to be unaware of this.
Study after study has shown that vaccination reduced the impact of the virus:
"COVID-19 vaccination both before and after having COVID-19 significantly decreased post–COVID-19 conditions for the circulating variants during the study period although vaccine effectiveness was low." https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9726631/
"These findings suggest that first-generation COVID-19 mRNA vaccines were associated with protection against COVID-19" https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2802473
"Three and four doses of BNT162b2 or CoronaVac were effective against Omicron infection 7 days after vaccination (VE of 48% (95% credible interval 34–64%) and 69% (46–98%) for three and four doses of BNT162b2, respectively; VE of 30% (1–66%) and 56% (6–97%) for three and four doses of CoronaVac, respectively)." https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-023-02219-5
"The efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines is higher for preventing severe infection and death than for preventing milder infection." https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanmic/article/PIIS2666-5247(22)00390-1/fulltext https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9441009/