This particular computer modeling study confirms that it excluded 1539 patients from the original 2622. Also, the pooled Relative Effectiveness of 95% confidence interval (95% CI) was guessed using Metaprop calculation. The results were presented in predefined subgroup analyses, and many excluded without reason.
The mRNA Covid injections do not prevent infection. Any allegation to the contrary is based on assumptive computer modeling.
The injections were mandated while having no long term safety
User u/urallfucked edited the above comment in order to hide the computer modeling study alleging Covid vaccine efficacy
This particular computer modeling study confirms that it excluded 1539 patients from the original 2622. Also, the pooled Relative Effectiveness of 95% confidence interval (95% CI) was guessed using Metaprop calculation. The results were presented in predefined subgroup analyses, and many excluded without reason.
The mRNA Covid injections do not prevent infection. Any allegation to the contrary is based on assumptive computer modeling.
The injections were mandated while having no long term safety
Lotsa bullshit here folks. For example:
In fact there were "1,246,266 cases ... included in this study" https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10198032/
I guess it's OK for her to edit material even though she complains about others doing it.
Is she just learning that now? "While vaccinations don’t entirely prevent infection, this study demonstrates that vaccination significantly reduces morbidity and mortality by significantly reducing elevated levels of cytokines and chemokines that are correlated with a higher risk of severe infection." https://news.cuanschutz.edu/news-stories/new-research-shines-light-on-how-covid-19-vaccination-reduces-severity-and-mortality-after-breakthrough-infections
No one who says this has yet answered the question "What would be the effect of letting the virus run free while the long term studies were done?"