Don't get your medical advice from anonymous people on social media folks, especially someone who is pretending to be another user.
This is just some anonymous imposter's selection from the rules, and she isn't telling the whole story because the rest of it doesn't fit her narrative. She chooses the part of the definition she likes and ignores the rest. Here's the whole thing:
"A probable case or death is defined by i) meeting clinical criteria AND epidemiologic evidence with no confirmatory laboratory testing performed for COVID-19; or ii) meeting presumptive laboratory evidence AND either clinical criteria OR epidemiologic evidence; or iii) meeting vital records criteria with no confirmatory laboratory testing performed for COVID19" https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/us-data/
Hey dumbfuck why don't you read the article? Or is it above your reading comprehension so that's why you rely on spoonfed bullshit narratives to convince yourself you're not a massive fucking loser.
You've said the Vax was wizard poison and people should be dropping dead. "Injected with sudden death". Are you going to change your dumbass tune now that that's been proven explicitly false? Or are you going to continue to drink piss and give your money to grifters for snake oil because you don't know any better, your family has abandoned you, and you'd rather just be a nazi than improve as a person even slightly?
Don't get your medical advice from anonymous people on social media folks, especially someone who is pretending to be another user..
This is just some anonymous imposter's version of the rules, and she isn't telling the whole story because the rest of it doesn't fit her narrative. She chooses the part of the definition she likes and ignores the rest. Here's the whole thing:
"A probable case or death is defined by i) meeting clinical criteria AND epidemiologic evidence with no confirmatory laboratory testing performed for COVID-19; or ii) meeting presumptive laboratory evidence AND either clinical criteria OR epidemiologic evidence; or iii) meeting vital records criteria with no confirmatory laboratory testing performed for COVID19" https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/us-data/
Folks Tuchodi here. Dumb fuck.
Like I said, science means guessing “Possible Covid”
Could be influenza, could be Covid, it’s the doctors guess.
No lab test. Will never know ¯_(ツ)_/¯
That’s science folks
TL;DR Doctors guessed it was Covid.
👇👇
A « probable Covid death » is defined by no confirmatory laboratory testing performed for COVID-19.
Doctors guessed the 7MILLION deaths were Covid folks. Could’ve been the flu. WE WILL NEVER KNOW . 💩✊🏾
Don't get your medical advice from anonymous people on social media folks, especially someone who is pretending to be another user.
Don't get your medical advice from anonymous people on social media folks, especially someone who is pretending to be another user.
This is just some anonymous imposter's selection from the rules, and she isn't telling the whole story because the rest of it doesn't fit her narrative. She chooses the part of the definition she likes and ignores the rest. Here's the whole thing:
"A probable case or death is defined by i) meeting clinical criteria AND epidemiologic evidence with no confirmatory laboratory testing performed for COVID-19; or ii) meeting presumptive laboratory evidence AND either clinical criteria OR epidemiologic evidence; or iii) meeting vital records criteria with no confirmatory laboratory testing performed for COVID19" https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/us-data/
Pure projection folks.
That is what this person would do: whatever their bosses tell them.
It says everything about her and nothing about scientists.
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/canada/article-new-evidence-confirms-covid-19-vaccines-are-overwhelmingly-safe/
This on the other hand, IS science, and it says the covid vaccines are "overwhelmingly safe"
Cry about it why dont you
Hey dumbfuck why don't you read the article? Or is it above your reading comprehension so that's why you rely on spoonfed bullshit narratives to convince yourself you're not a massive fucking loser.
You've said the Vax was wizard poison and people should be dropping dead. "Injected with sudden death". Are you going to change your dumbass tune now that that's been proven explicitly false? Or are you going to continue to drink piss and give your money to grifters for snake oil because you don't know any better, your family has abandoned you, and you'd rather just be a nazi than improve as a person even slightly?
Folks, as a fat boomer ,
I think « possible Covid » is science and
I think Globe and Mail bloggers is science
Don't be like tuchidiot folks.
Don't get your medical advice from anonymous people on social media folks, especially someone who is pretending to be another user..
This is just some anonymous imposter's version of the rules, and she isn't telling the whole story because the rest of it doesn't fit her narrative. She chooses the part of the definition she likes and ignores the rest. Here's the whole thing:
"A probable case or death is defined by i) meeting clinical criteria AND epidemiologic evidence with no confirmatory laboratory testing performed for COVID-19; or ii) meeting presumptive laboratory evidence AND either clinical criteria OR epidemiologic evidence; or iii) meeting vital records criteria with no confirmatory laboratory testing performed for COVID19" https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/us-data/