This is what he posted:
"Two main statistics have been used to count coronavirus (COVID-19) deaths in England: death \registrations involving COVID-19 (reported by the ONS) and deaths within 28 days of a positive SARS-COV-2 test (reported by the UKHSA). The 28-day measure is a timely measure of COVID-19 deaths to inform public health response, but less precise than death registrations which consider the cause of death.
When compared, the 2 measures closely tracked one another (85 to 90% correlation) between May 2020 and December 2021.
85% to 90% correlation would mean covid death stats were over-stated by up to 15%.
What? I guess you don’t understand what i said. You could read it again or, perhaps, ask your mom to explain it.
You've already acknowledged that the clinical test is more accurate and has been in use since 2020. Please provide some support for your opinion that it has not been used.
Opinion? No. It’s in your link. I don’t care if you lack comprehension of basic English.
That's her opinion folks.
She can't be bothered to provide any proof.
In the past she's used "I already told you that" as an excuse for not providing support for her statements.
And here it's just a matter of copying and pasting something she claims to have presented just a few days ago.
But no, that's too much trouble for her, apparently.
So she acknowledges that the clinical determination of covid is an accurate death count that has been around since 2020 but maintains without proof that it has only been published recently.
It is your link and, as usual, you don’t even understand it.
Here’s a simple summary:
I think you’re in denial now; your whole reason for being is to push covid death fears. Calm down. We ain’t gonna die.