This is what he posted:
"Two main statistics have been used to count coronavirus (COVID-19) deaths in England: death \registrations involving COVID-19 (reported by the ONS) and deaths within 28 days of a positive SARS-COV-2 test (reported by the UKHSA). The 28-day measure is a timely measure of COVID-19 deaths to inform public health response, but less precise than death registrations which consider the cause of death.
When compared, the 2 measures closely tracked one another (85 to 90% correlation) between May 2020 and December 2021.
85% to 90% correlation would mean covid death stats were over-stated by up to 15%.
lol. That’s what your link says. Unless you edited previous comments, as you tend to do. I’m not checking.
Steadfastly refusing to produce the proof she claims she has folks.
She says "I have a quote that proves I'm right but I'm not going to produce it ... for ... reasons."
😂
I’m not gonna read or comprehend what i posted… for reasons
She can't find the quote she says she has folks.
Your link.
I’ll tell you something else. The 10-20 % correlation is the exact same as saying covid deaths are over-stated by up to 20% (a little more, actually, if you want to be mathematically correct).
They could present it to you either way. They choose with stating it as a correlation because it doesn’t seem as bad that way. This is done intentionally to manipulate people. It works because the majority of the population is dumb. It worked on you.
This happens more than you think. It’s everywhere. You and most others will never realize you’re being manipulated.
People without stats training, like yourself, should at least read a non-technical book like Innumeracy or How To Lie With Statistics. This will help protect you from looking like a fool when you argue with someone about basic math.