I'm simply saying it you choose to reject a forced injection through coercion or mandates there is case law that supports the crown case to take your child.
I think you are attempting to fool the general audience into believing that no one will take a child for vaccination resistance when it has been done before.
All this without supplying a single instance of a child being removed from its family because it wasn't vaccinated.
Trying to link AIDS and covid vaccines: too many times to list. If I'm wrong you will agree with me that there is no connection between AIDS and covid vaccines.
But you won't. You will leave the door open to that connection because you think they're connected because they both relate to the immune system.
Those are all this you made up in your own mind putting together parts of what I say. You have a complex.
And yet you never actually address the context just pick and choose.
Based on my sources all of it is fair. Nature said "fatal" and you haven't contacted them yet to see if it was accurate.
Anyone who wants to can read your comments and see that it's all true.
Tapeworms: https://omegacanada.win/p/17rmSrqBkr/man-died-with-tapeworm-tumours/c/
"Tapeworms are flat, not round, and are not killed by ivermectin."
Removing children: https://omegacanada.win/p/17rmO7keGv/x/c/4Z7QYavwKjx?d=50
All this without supplying a single instance of a child being removed from its family because it wasn't vaccinated.
Trying to link AIDS and covid vaccines: too many times to list. If I'm wrong you will agree with me that there is no connection between AIDS and covid vaccines.
But you won't. You will leave the door open to that connection because you think they're connected because they both relate to the immune system.
Insisting on your own definition of a term: https://omegacanada.win/p/17rmSsw6lc/x/c/4Z7Qs1sa16U
When you have no proof of these deaths.
Nature did not write the paper. The paper provided links. The links did not say fatal.
I bet you haven't read them.