Myocarditis in SARS-CoV-2 infection vs. COVID-19 vaccination: A systematic review and meta-analysis
This study aimed to compare the incidence of myocarditis in COVID-19 vaccines and in severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection groups.Electronic databases (MEDLINE, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochra...
The Pandemic of sudden death in young boys and athletes only began in 2021.
Remember that folks.
The NIH is the co-owner of the Moderna mRNA patent. The US government is among the top licensees of mRNA patents.
https://www.contagionlive.com/view/young-men-at-increased-risk-of-myocarditis-after-mrna-covid-19-vaccination
Investigators noted that the crude reporting rates for cases of myocarditis within 7 days of COVID mRNA vaccination exceeded expectation across multiple strata of age and sex. The myocarditis rate was even greater in males aged 16 – 17 years old (105.9 per 1 million). The myocarditis rate remained significant for men aged 18 – 24 years old for both vaccines (BNT162b2, 52.4 per 1 million; mRNA-1273,56.3 per 1 million).
So the government investigated itself.
Then ran a database scan.
And HOLY SHIT the government concluded that their mRNA experiment was safe. No long term data.
CONCLUSION: Folks, I’m a massive dumb fuck
From your link:
Oster and colleagues sought to describe the reports and confirmed cases of myocarditis available in the national passive surveillance VAERS database among individuals vaccinated with either Pfizer-BioNTech’s BNT162b2 or Moderna’s mRNA-1273, to provide estimated risks of myocarditis after vaccination based on age, sex and vaccine type.
Tldr; you're trying to use vaers (the weakest form of evidence because anyone can make an unverified report) to discredit a meta analysis with 22 studies (is the gold standard in the scientific method)
Weak. Sauce.
👆🏾 Dumb fucks get downvoted
Apparently not, actually.