Investigators noted that the crude reporting rates for cases of myocarditis within 7 days of COVID mRNA vaccination exceeded expectation across multiple strata of age and sex. The myocarditis rate was even greater in males aged 16 – 17 years old (105.9 per 1 million). The myocarditis rate remained significant for men aged 18 – 24 years old for both vaccines (BNT162b2, 52.4 per 1 million; mRNA-1273,56.3 per 1 million).
Oster and colleagues sought to describe the reports and confirmed cases of myocarditis available in the national passive surveillance VAERS database among individuals vaccinated with either Pfizer-BioNTech’s BNT162b2 or Moderna’s mRNA-1273, to provide estimated risks of myocarditis after vaccination based on age, sex and vaccine type.
Tldr; you're trying to use vaers (the weakest form of evidence because anyone can make an unverified report) to discredit a meta analysis with 22 studies (is the gold standard in the scientific method)
The NIH is the co-owner of the Moderna mRNA patent. The US government is among the top licensees of mRNA patents.
https://www.contagionlive.com/view/young-men-at-increased-risk-of-myocarditis-after-mrna-covid-19-vaccination
Investigators noted that the crude reporting rates for cases of myocarditis within 7 days of COVID mRNA vaccination exceeded expectation across multiple strata of age and sex. The myocarditis rate was even greater in males aged 16 – 17 years old (105.9 per 1 million). The myocarditis rate remained significant for men aged 18 – 24 years old for both vaccines (BNT162b2, 52.4 per 1 million; mRNA-1273,56.3 per 1 million).
So the government investigated itself.
Then ran a database scan.
And HOLY SHIT the government concluded that their mRNA experiment was safe. No long term data.
CONCLUSION: Folks, I’m a massive dumb fuck
From your link:
Oster and colleagues sought to describe the reports and confirmed cases of myocarditis available in the national passive surveillance VAERS database among individuals vaccinated with either Pfizer-BioNTech’s BNT162b2 or Moderna’s mRNA-1273, to provide estimated risks of myocarditis after vaccination based on age, sex and vaccine type.
Tldr; you're trying to use vaers (the weakest form of evidence because anyone can make an unverified report) to discredit a meta analysis with 22 studies (is the gold standard in the scientific method)
Weak. Sauce.
👆🏾 Dumb fucks get downvoted
Apparently not, actually.