You don’t need to be an infectious disease expert to interpret infectious disease data, retard. You do, however, need to be an expert in interpreting statistical data. The author has a phd in stats. She’s fully qualified to interpret the data.
People with infectious diseases have been isolated for thousands of years folks. See Leviticus 13 & 14, for example, supposedly written in about 700 BCE.
In the middle ages just arriving from another country was enough to put you in quarantine for 40 days.
The fact that healthcare officials recommended "better safe than sorry" during the outbreak of a new-to-humans viral infection is not a problem, and if a statistician figures she can make a buck by feeding the cult's fears it says a lot about both her and the cult.
You don’t need to be an infectious disease expert to interpret infectious disease data, retard. You do, however, need to be an expert in interpreting statistical data. The author has a phd in stats. She’s fully qualified to interpret the data.
Folks computer modeling is fake. Input fake data, output fake data .
It’s perfect for fake pandemics.
I’m a hateful boomer. So I approve hate science
People with infectious diseases have been isolated for thousands of years folks. See Leviticus 13 & 14, for example, supposedly written in about 700 BCE.
In the middle ages just arriving from another country was enough to put you in quarantine for 40 days.
The fact that healthcare officials recommended "better safe than sorry" during the outbreak of a new-to-humans viral infection is not a problem, and if a statistician figures she can make a buck by feeding the cult's fears it says a lot about both her and the cult.
That’s quite a way to say that you were wrong and agree with me.
I think I remember wondering if she was right about something once folks.
Briefly.
A long time ago.
Maybe it was someone else.
Yeah, it was probably someone else.