See where it says "This is the first report of measles transmission from a twice-vaccinated individual" folks?
Why do you think the impostor chooses to characterize this as "Public health officials were wrong once again."?
It's a consistent theme with her: "The government should have been ready to protect me from this!"
Look back through her posts and comments and you'll see the theme: a new infectious disease appears? Nothing the scientists do - or the government, acting on their advice - is good enough for the impostor, because it doesn't guarantee that she will be 100% protected.
She's clearly not prepared to deal with real life. She wants somebody to cover all the sharp edges with soft padding, so she won't have to worry.
See where it says "This is the first report of measles transmission from a twice-vaccinated individual" folks?
Why do you think the impostor chooses to characterize this as "Public health officials were wrong once again."?
It's a consistent theme with her: "The government should have been ready to protect me from this!"
Look back through her posts and comments and you'll see the theme: a new infectious disease appears? Nothing the scientists do - or the government, acting on their advice - is good enough for the impostor, because it doesn't guarantee that she will be 100% protected.
She's clearly not prepared to deal with real life. She wants somebody to cover all the sharp edges with soft padding, so she won't have to worry.
If you want to read the paper yourself instead of accepting her excerpts and interpretation, here it is: https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/58/9/1205/2895266?login=false#55003185
Remember, when measles breaks out: