"Since the article refers to both therapeutic and “prophylactic” treatments, it would appear plausible that it could be used to criminalise opposition to vaccines, and this may well have been the original intention. However – somewhat contradictorily, it must be said – the relevant paragraph in the form passed by the French National Assembly clearly limits the application of the law to persons who are already ill or, per the language of the text, “suffering from a medical condition” (atteint d’une pathologie).
"Since the article refers to both therapeutic and “prophylactic” treatments, it would appear plausible that it could be used to criminalise opposition to vaccines, and this may well have been the original intention. However – somewhat contradictorily, it must be said – the relevant paragraph in the form passed by the French National Assembly clearly limits the application of the law to persons who are already ill or, per the language of the text, “suffering from a medical condition” (atteint d’une pathologie).
As an obese Leftist with VAIDS and POX, I’m spreading disease and misinformation
Get injected with clots and strokes folks.
CDC claims it’s effective.
As a boosted boomer, I’m a Covid super spreader.
I’m a disease vector folks.
https://cdc.com./cdc-director-confirms-the-fully-vaccinated-are-super-spreaders-carrying-and-spreading-covid-virus
Folks, if you are old fat and mentally ill like me, get vaccinated so you can infect other too
Maybe not.
"Since the article refers to both therapeutic and “prophylactic” treatments, it would appear plausible that it could be used to criminalise opposition to vaccines, and this may well have been the original intention. However – somewhat contradictorily, it must be said – the relevant paragraph in the form passed by the French National Assembly clearly limits the application of the law to persons who are already ill or, per the language of the text, “suffering from a medical condition” (atteint d’une pathologie).
Hence, it is hard to see how any judge could interpret such provisions as applying to vaccines, whether mRNA-based or otherwise." https://dailysceptic.org/2024/02/16/no-new-french-law-does-not-criminalise-opposition-to-mrna-vaccines-but-its-troubling-enough/
Maybe not.
"Since the article refers to both therapeutic and “prophylactic” treatments, it would appear plausible that it could be used to criminalise opposition to vaccines, and this may well have been the original intention. However – somewhat contradictorily, it must be said – the relevant paragraph in the form passed by the French National Assembly clearly limits the application of the law to persons who are already ill or, per the language of the text, “suffering from a medical condition” (atteint d’une pathologie).
Hence, it is hard to see how any judge could interpret such provisions as applying to vaccines, whether mRNA-based or otherwise." https://dailysceptic.org/2024/02/16/no-new-french-law-does-not-criminalise-opposition-to-mrna-vaccines-but-its-troubling-enough/