"Since the article refers to both therapeutic and “prophylactic” treatments, it would appear plausible that it could be used to criminalise opposition to vaccines, and this may well have been the original intention. However – somewhat contradictorily, it must be said – the relevant paragraph in the form passed by the French National Assembly clearly limits the application of the law to persons who are already ill or, per the language of the text, “suffering from a medical condition” (atteint d’une pathologie).
Maybe not.
"Since the article refers to both therapeutic and “prophylactic” treatments, it would appear plausible that it could be used to criminalise opposition to vaccines, and this may well have been the original intention. However – somewhat contradictorily, it must be said – the relevant paragraph in the form passed by the French National Assembly clearly limits the application of the law to persons who are already ill or, per the language of the text, “suffering from a medical condition” (atteint d’une pathologie).
Hence, it is hard to see how any judge could interpret such provisions as applying to vaccines, whether mRNA-based or otherwise." https://dailysceptic.org/2024/02/16/no-new-french-law-does-not-criminalise-opposition-to-mrna-vaccines-but-its-troubling-enough/