Huh! Alex Jones called for Trump's assassination
(twitter.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (49)
sorted by:
So evidence of malfeasance isn't enough.
Accuracy is preferable folks. There's nothing in her link about spying on Trump.
As for https://thehill.com/policy/national-security/4012650-fbi-misused-surveillance-tool-fisa-section-702/ the word 'lied' does not appear, neither do 'lies', 'lied', or 'lying'.
If she's going to use them as sources she should quote them accurately.
And for 'everything the FBI says is a lie', well, she's entitled to her opinion. I believe they found that Crooks had a presence on social media, and I have provided several non-anonymous links to back that up, unlike "There is no evidence of a social media existentence" ConfidentlyIncorrectAnither.
Misleading or changing evidence is lying.
So by that definition she is lying when she says "FBI lied to the fisa courts to obtain a warrant to spy on Trump" - and she did - when in fact they did were not seeking a warrant to spy on Trump.
I can live with that.
When you spy on his campaign, you include him as part of the targeting.
I wonder how upset you'll be when they add Trumps face with the ear to Mount Rushmore?
Will that finally be the straw that breaks the camels back?
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/jack-smiths-team-admits-key-evidence-in-trump-case-has-been-tampered-with-court-misled-about-it/ar-BB1lPCCv
Great example of what is considered standard procedures
She seems to be confused about what is a tabloid journalist's opinion and what was actually said in court folks.