"Not a single person who refused the poison regrets it" - not
(www.nbcnews.com)
Comments (6)
sorted by:
Still going on with the propaganda. Not once will they run an article about people who were vaccine injured, let alone link the died suddenlies with the vaxx. They will engage in the wildest tuchidiocies to explain sudden deaths like air conditioners, marijuana, etc. And the sad thing is that there are enough tuchidiots out there, that a significant portion of the population will actually buy this shit.
Folks, you need to reject tuchidiocy.
She says, without providing such an article herself.
Well Duh!
Yet one more case of "I don't need to provide any proof to back up my claims" on OmegaCanada folks.
The reason she doesn't provide any herself is because they are hard to find. There are so few of them compared to deaths - 7 million + - and apparently permanent and semi-permanent injury - nearly 18 million in the US alone - from the virus.
You know, tuchi, I am starting to feel sorry for you. How pathetic is it for you to preach on behalf of pharmaceutical companies, extolling the safety of their products, when it is an established fact that properly prescribed meds that are correctly taken, account for 100,000 or more deaths per year and 2 million seriously ill. This figure has nothing to do with the vaxx, which is a totally different and deadlier elephant in the room that everyone has to ignore. But the fact that the correctly taken prescriptions are this deadly should give any rational person pause to wonder whether a rushed vaxxine brought to us by a company convicted of criminal fraud is really that safe.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/health/daily/april98/drugs041598.htm
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25355584/
1998 folks.
2014
Old technology, and absent global pandemics. It's almost as though Kinder12 refuses to accept anything except perfection, never mind the millions of dead.
Anyway, none of that changes the fact that "Not a single person who refused the poison regrets it" is misinformation at best and a pernicious lie when spread by people who know better.
Oh no I cited well established studies and you have nothing to the contrary. Oh my, what a silly little tuchidiot.
A 26 year-old newspaper article about a no-longer-available study, and an opinion piece by a single person that offers this caveat: "The opinions expressed by the author are not necessarily those of the journal editors, Polish Society of Internal Medicine, or publisher."
Hardly peer-reviewed science folks.
"It was that way decades ago and that's all the proof I need that things are exactly the same today. The fact that I have nothing current to offer - let alone anything that applies to the recent global pandemic - doesn't matter."
No doubt Kinder12 misses the days of land lines and dial-up Internet.