You forgot the "folks" in your reply.
Notice, however, how this thing shows its true stripes by always referring to posters it disagrees with as females as if there was something inherently vile or less than for being a woman. Not sure if this misogynistic creature has ever been with a woman, but it does not like them. Poor creature.
Back to "folks". I was optimistic about you my little NPC. The programming is strong in this creature.
Officials categorically stated that if you got vaccinated you could not get infected or pass it on. Then cases amid the vaccinated came out and they were just "break through" cases. You are having to retcon what they said in order to deal with the fact that they lied and this does not work, apart from any health risks.
It is remarkable and a sign of your incoherent tuchidiocy that you dismiss out of hand the former head of the CDC yet you would accept the claims of the CDC if they confirm your faith in the vaxx.
Remember what you have posted when you get diagnosed. If there is time for you.
But I do commend you for refaining from saying "folks" in your post.
One day you may be a data point, just one more victim of the jab.
You were okay with Fauci and Biden making absurd claims of a winter of death for the unvaxxed, with no data, but you don't like it when the wind blows the other way.
- Why is Kinder12 ignoring that and focusing on the fact that it didn't prevent people from getting infected?
You really are pathetic. Fauci and his ilk are the same folks who told you explicitly that if you got vaccinated you would not get covid. And yet the vaccine does not work as advertised. So forcing everyone to get vaccinated clearly would not protect grandma from getting it.
Firstly there would still be carriers of covid to infect her and secondly she could still be infected herself.
Even if vaccinating grandma would offer her some reduction in severity of infection, then the solution was to vaccinate grandma and other vulnerable people only, not everyone including children who had almost no risk of death.
The fact that you cannot see the obvious or carry out even the most basic critical thinking, yet likely can vote, is a scary thought.
Did he or did he not get covid for the third time despite six vaccinations and boosters? How can you fail to notice the abject failure of his covid vaxx that was supposed to prevent transmission (hence the need to vaxx everybody so that the horrible unvaxxed did not kill grandma)
At some point even a tuchidiot might awaken and stop slavishly adoring authority.
At what point do you think, the snake oil this gnome is peddling doesnt work? Or do you say to yourself, hey if he hadnt been vaxxed and boosted 6 times he would have gotten covid a gazillion times instead of just three!
Again, silly, they make a point of saying that Amish excess deaths mirror the ups and downs of excess deaths of the unvaccinated population. And that is why you posted it. Otherwise neither you or anyone else would care.
You know, tuchi, I am starting to feel sorry for you. How pathetic is it for you to preach on behalf of pharmaceutical companies, extolling the safety of their products, when it is an established fact that properly prescribed meds that are correctly taken, account for 100,000 or more deaths per year and 2 million seriously ill. This figure has nothing to do with the vaxx, which is a totally different and deadlier elephant in the room that everyone has to ignore. But the fact that the correctly taken prescriptions are this deadly should give any rational person pause to wonder whether a rushed vaxxine brought to us by a company convicted of criminal fraud is really that safe.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/health/daily/april98/drugs041598.htm
You must be reading a tuchidioty alternate version of this abstract. It clearly attempts to make a link to vaccinations. Hence why it emphasizes, in the abstract, : "results indicate that the timing of the onset and decline of spikes of excess death rates among the Amish/Mennonites are similar to waves of COVID-19 reported in the United States"
The problem with this abstract is that percentages are misleading and secondly it only measures excess deaths during the pandemic. It does not compare the continuing high excess rates in all vaxxed populations with the Amish
So to elaborate:
-
Percentages - if you have 1 death and then you have 3, you can be an alarmist and note that the death rate is up by 300 percent. Big spikes like that are easy when the starting number is very low. The Amish are generally healthier due to lifestyle and so their death rate is lower to begin with. Any spike will seem impressive.
-
Mirroring General Population - the compares the Amish population to the general (presumably vaxxed population) with spikes in excess deaths and notes a corresponding rise and fall.
Presumably you think this means that the vaxx is not dangerous because the death rates are the same.
But - in fact it seems to indicate that the vaxx is useless. If the vaxx offered protection against covid, then the death rate should not just mirror that of the general population, but instead should be higher. The fact that they are comparable means that being unvaxxed does not expose the unvaxxed to any greater risk to covid.
Does it then establish that the vaxx is safe because the excess mortality rate is similar? No, because the comparison period is abbreviated. It compares mortality during the covid epidemic. It does not compare the excess mortality rate afterwards. Do the vaxxed die in greater number now, four years on. The study does not address this. So it cannot be used to support the argument that tuchi seems to be making.
Still going on with the propaganda. Not once will they run an article about people who were vaccine injured, let alone link the died suddenlies with the vaxx. They will engage in the wildest tuchidiocies to explain sudden deaths like air conditioners, marijuana, etc. And the sad thing is that there are enough tuchidiots out there, that a significant portion of the population will actually buy this shit.
Folks, you need to reject tuchidiocy.
Yes, hence a pedant. The fact that you would actually post the definition, as if I did not know the word, makes you even more of a pedant. We will need to expand the definition of a tuchidiot to mean a pedantic idiot.
All the best. Say hi to the folks for me.
So if they issued a statement on twitter in his name and then gave him a cup of warm cocoa and tucked the senile skeletor into bed, does that mean it was not a coup and everything is fine and democratic, in your opinion? Stop being such a pedant.
I think that you believe it because you moronically change everyone's user name into a feminine version, when you are trying to put them down. If you did not think it was an insult you would not change the user name of your debate opponent into Canadette and the like. I know you are dumb but don't play dumber than you are. Everyone can see what sort you are. Even the folks.