2
Kronder12 2 points ago +2 / -0

The problem is out of control human rights tribunals that can ruin you if you are seen as discriminating. These unelected bodies have subverted Canadian society.

1
Kronder12 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's a bit of a generalization. For example, many indigenous kids who have dysfunctional parents have functional grandmas or aunts and uncles, who raise them as their own and they can continue to rely on extended family.

1
Kronder12 1 point ago +1 / -0

Support from the child care agencies ends at around 22. By then they are adults and no different than any one else, facing the same struggles.

Even people who have functional families cannot necessarily count on those families to help them in time of need. Just because a family has not been involved in the child protection system and their parents are functional it does not mean that they have a lot of resources. Yet most young people do not end up homeless, even if they came through the child protection system.

I am not saying that having a family to help you isnt good and useful, but it is not the main factor in causing homelessness.

Most of the people on the street are addicts, which is due to their poor choices. Many are also suffering from mental illnesses. The mental illnesses are sometimes aggravated by their own choices such as self medicating with drugs and alcohol, and lifestyle, and certainly made worse by a medical system that hands out pills to deal with mental illness instead of looking for holistic solutions, and provides so called counseling by useless social workers who have never fixed anyone's problems in their lives.

Some people are overwhelmed by life due to mental illness, low IQ, behavioural issues, and addiction and no amount of family or support services will save them.

As a side note, to emphasize my contempt for social workers. We have a dry out center in my city that they call a "Sobering Center". As the name suggests it is supposed to be for people trying to get off their latest drug and alcohol binge. You would think that people who refuse to even try might be kicked out, if only to remove the temptation of drugs and the example of negative behaviour from the others who are trying. But no. Recently the people in the sobering center realized that they could get a bigger high if they inserted meth up their ass. When the sobering center discovered this, their solution was to buy them lube so their stupid choices would not wreck their anus. That in a nutshell is what is wrong with the system.

1
Kronder12 1 point ago +1 / -0

Except its usually not true. At least in my province the agencies provide support and housing way into their twenties, together with training on how to live independently. Some people just make bad choices.

1
Kronder12 1 point ago +1 / -0

Was the tuchidiot a moderator? How can you tell who is?

1
Kronder12 1 point ago +1 / -0

You mean the lefties were assigned to suppress voters and intimidate elderly men? I am shocked.

2
Kronder12 2 points ago +2 / -0

It may be right that uralfucked is the tuchidiot's alt account. It's certainly a more unhinged version of the tuchidiot.

We will have to give uralfucked a proper nickname to mock it into oblivion. If it even continues.

I suspect that the lefties are now re-allocating their spending, so we may not hear from the demented lefties as much as we used to.

2
Kronder12 2 points ago +2 / -0

"here the majority of voters will choose Harris and are - by her definition - "(tuch)idiots"

Came back to gloat. Ah ah ah.....Ah ah ah.

How does it feel to realize the folks aren't buying what you are selling?

2
Kronder12 2 points ago +2 / -0

"Personally I think Harris will win."

Are you okay Tuchodi? Have you internalized the failure of your ideas and vapid appeals to folks? The folks hate what you peddle. The only reason you didn't realize that is because you live in a woke echo chamber where you do not see reality.

2
Kronder12 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's only a bot, folks. Bots and demented leftists aren't human. We can be mean to it.

1
Kronder12 1 point ago +1 / -0

"where the majority of voters will choose Harris "

Ah ah you smug tuchidiot.

You have no idea how out of touch you are with reality. When you talk to imaginary folks you do not hear the truth.

2
Kronder12 2 points ago +2 / -0

The Tuchidiot is so lacking in self awareness that apparently (x)(s)he(it) fails to understand the sarcasm.

Indeed, Kamala is a master of word salad. Lefties - who by definition are (tuch)idiots - gobble up her drivel because to them she is actually speaking at a Shakesperean level since they (the proverbial "folks" in all of the Tuchidiot's posts) are even dumber than her.

5
Kronder12 5 points ago +5 / -0

No, it does not look stupid enough. But maybe one of the folks?

2
Kronder12 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think that you believe it because you moronically change everyone's user name into a feminine version, when you are trying to put them down. If you did not think it was an insult you would not change the user name of your debate opponent into Canadette and the like. I know you are dumb but don't play dumber than you are. Everyone can see what sort you are. Even the folks.

3
Kronder12 3 points ago +3 / -0

"Folks! Folks! The science evolves!" - The Real Tuchidiot

3
Kronder12 3 points ago +3 / -0

You forgot the "folks" in your reply.

Notice, however, how this thing shows its true stripes by always referring to posters it disagrees with as females as if there was something inherently vile or less than for being a woman. Not sure if this misogynistic creature has ever been with a woman, but it does not like them. Poor creature.

1
Kronder12 1 point ago +1 / -0

Back to "folks". I was optimistic about you my little NPC. The programming is strong in this creature.

Officials categorically stated that if you got vaccinated you could not get infected or pass it on. Then cases amid the vaccinated came out and they were just "break through" cases. You are having to retcon what they said in order to deal with the fact that they lied and this does not work, apart from any health risks.

2
Kronder12 2 points ago +2 / -0

It is remarkable and a sign of your incoherent tuchidiocy that you dismiss out of hand the former head of the CDC yet you would accept the claims of the CDC if they confirm your faith in the vaxx.

Remember what you have posted when you get diagnosed. If there is time for you.

But I do commend you for refaining from saying "folks" in your post.

2
Kronder12 2 points ago +2 / -0

One day you may be a data point, just one more victim of the jab.

You were okay with Fauci and Biden making absurd claims of a winter of death for the unvaxxed, with no data, but you don't like it when the wind blows the other way.

1
Kronder12 1 point ago +1 / -0
  • Why is Kinder12 ignoring that and focusing on the fact that it didn't prevent people from getting infected?

You really are pathetic. Fauci and his ilk are the same folks who told you explicitly that if you got vaccinated you would not get covid. And yet the vaccine does not work as advertised. So forcing everyone to get vaccinated clearly would not protect grandma from getting it.

Firstly there would still be carriers of covid to infect her and secondly she could still be infected herself.

Even if vaccinating grandma would offer her some reduction in severity of infection, then the solution was to vaccinate grandma and other vulnerable people only, not everyone including children who had almost no risk of death.

The fact that you cannot see the obvious or carry out even the most basic critical thinking, yet likely can vote, is a scary thought.

1
Kronder12 1 point ago +1 / -0

Did he or did he not get covid for the third time despite six vaccinations and boosters? How can you fail to notice the abject failure of his covid vaxx that was supposed to prevent transmission (hence the need to vaxx everybody so that the horrible unvaxxed did not kill grandma)

view more: Next ›